History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal EngineersConnolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
History
History of the Royal Sappers and Miners, Volume 1 (of 2): From the Formation of the Corps in March 1712 to the date when its designation was changed to that of Royal Engineers
Connolly, T. W. J. (Thomas William John)
Great Britain. Army. Royal Sappers and Miners
Sergeant Hugh Lanyon, after Sergeant-major Forbes’s removal, was
appointed to the charge of the detachment at Sandhurst College, and
carried on the field details in every way to the satisfaction of the
authorities. For many years, as a private and non-commissioned
officer, he worked at the college, and his example had the best
effect on the successive parties with which he served. As a
practical sapper he was one of the ablest and most skilful in the
corps, and in the rapidity with which he threw up earth-works was
unsurpassed. Sir Charles Pasley has done him honour by noticing the
extraordinary labours of the sergeant in his ‘Practical Operations
for a Siege.’[300] His willingness and ability in this respect,
covered, in great measure, his educational deficiencies. In charge
of the detachment he displayed his usual industry and exertion, kept
his men in perfect discipline and order, and the excellent work
resulting from their united efforts elicited an encomium in a
popular periodical very creditable to the sergeant and his
party.[301] Indeed, so effectually were all the instructional
operations carried out, that the governor of the college, with the
sanction of the Master-General, presented him in November with a
case of drawing instruments, bearing an inscription flattering to
his zeal and services.[302]
-----
Footnote 300:
Pages 51 and 57, notes, 1st part, 2nd edit. It may be tolerated to
mention the instances in which Lanyon figured, to deserve the
record. In October, 1828, he finished a parallel in very easy soil
of 262 cubic feet in 2 hours and 41 minutes, whilst an able-bodied
sapper, unskilful at the pickaxe and the shovel, only completed
the same content of excavation in 8 hours and 4 minutes! Thirty
men were employed at the same time at similar tasks, the result of
whose labours showed that for each man, strong and trained, it
required to execute the work an average period of 4 hours and 54
minutes. The other instance refers to his completing the first
task of a parallel, nearly 109 cubic feet, in easy soil in 16
minutes. In the Peninsula sieges, no more than 42 cubic feet of
excavation appears to have been excavated by each individual of
the military working parties as his first night’s work; but at the
rate which rendered Lanyon celebrated, an active workman in these
sieges ought to have finished his first night’s task in seven
minutes! The comparison makes the difference so excessive, that
credulity has scarcely sufficient tension to accredit it; but
coming from an authority so proverbial for his accuracy, there is
no alternative but to wonder at the achievements of the man who so
signalized himself as a sapper; and to add, with the Colonel, the
expression of mortification, “that the exertions of the British
army should have fallen so miserably short of their brilliant
exploits in the field.”
Footnote 301:
‘United Service Journal,’ ii. 1837, p. 279.
Footnote 302:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account