History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
We know full well the high cost of distribution, and some are
sanguine the productive cost could also be lessened; could not this
sum, then, of £200, or say £300, required for storage purposes be
laid out on a branch bakery in the Johnstone district, and take away
a third of the trade from the centre; you would then have storage to
suit your requirements for some time to come, very probably you
would be less for productive expenses, and most certainly your cost
of distribution would be so much curtailed as to release the
Federation from the incubus which at present keeps her down.
Gentlemen, our aim and earnest desire is the prosperity of the
Federation and its component parts; we lay these considerations
before you and leave the matter in your hands, being confident your
united wisdom will be well able to direct the path which will
earliest and best lead to better and happier times for the United
Co-operative Baking Society.
THE JOHNSTONE SOCIETY’S COMMITTEE.
Johnstone, _21st February 1873_.
At that time it would seem that the representatives of all the societies
were enamoured with the idea of branching out, especially in view of the
very rosy picture which had been presented in the Johnstone Society’s
report, but they realised that at the moment branching out was
impossible. The Federation’s commitments in capital expenditure were
already as much as could be borne; the cost of building a new bakery
would add considerably to the burden, and neither delegates nor
directors could see how it could be carried; so, when the subject was
brought up again at the June quarterly meeting, it was left in the hands
of the committee, with the proviso that no extension take place until a
general meeting of the members had been called.
The proposal, however, had never been one which was pleasing to Barrhead
Society. Immediately after the remit to Johnstone Society and the
Paisley societies to collect information, a deputation from Barrhead had
waited on the Bakery committee, and, after pointing out that the capital
of the Society was far from being what it ought to be, they said they
had been instructed by their committee to state that they considered it
inexpedient in the meantime to proceed with the proposed branch at
either Paisley or Johnstone because of the plant and other necessaries
which would be required and which the funds of the Federation were not
in a position to meet. It was owing to the determined opposition of the
Barrhead and Thornliebank delegates and the strength of their argument
that the capital of the Society was insufficient for the enterprise,
that the Johnstone scheme was held over.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account