History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
Everything seemed to be going smoothly now, but it was only surface
tranquillity, for at the same meeting where the Barrhead Society passed
the resolution quoted above they also unanimously adopted another “to
grant powers to the acting committee of this society (the committee
which had been appointed to look out for premises suitable for a bakery)
to rent, lease, purchase, or erect premises suitable for carrying on its
own trade.” At the September meeting of the Baking Society, Mr Stark,
Barrhead, moved “that in order to preserve the integrity and harmony of
the Federation we consider it necessary that the resolution passed at
special meeting of the Federation, held on 29th April, ‘to plant a
branch bakery at Paisley or Johnstone,’ be rescinded by this meeting,
and that no permanent extension of the bakery take place beyond the
present premises.” Mr Hall, Thornliebank, seconded.
At once Paisley Provident delegates were on the alert, and Messrs
Lauchland and Cumming of that society moved as an amendment: “That this
meeting adheres to the resolution agreed to at special meeting on 29th
April, in reference to the planting of a branch in Paisley or
Johnstone.” The discussion was long and animated, but again the glamour
of a branch was on the delegates, and the Paisley amendment was agreed
to by 41 votes to 30 for Barrhead motion.
BARRHEAD DECIDES TO WITHDRAW.
This decision at once made its influence felt in Barrhead, and at the
monthly meeting of that society which took place on 12th September
notice was given of a resolution to the effect that “This Society hold a
special meeting on 8th November to consider a motion ‘that this Society
withdraw and cease to be a member of the U.C.B.S.’” At this special
meeting the resolution to withdraw was agreed to by a very large
majority, and on 4th December it was agreed that the Bakery committee be
informed officially of the decision to withdraw, and that the letter
state that the society would continue to purchase bread until their own
bakery was ready. It is probable that this letter was a result of what
had taken place at the Bakery quarterly meeting on the preceding
Saturday, when the chairman had been questioned about the withdrawal of
the society, and had stated that nothing official had yet been received
from Barrhead Society with reference to their withdrawal. He was also
questioned as to whether any steps had been taken with regard to
establishing a branch bakery, and stated that no action had been taken
regarding the branch. The subject then dropped.
DISSATISFACTION IN PAISLEY AND JOHNSTONE.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account