History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The effect of what passed at Washington was instantly felt at Albany.
Toward the middle of February, about three weeks after Jefferson had
civilly rejected the Vice-President’s advances, Burr’s friends in the
New York legislature announced that they should hold a caucus February
18, and nominate him as candidate for governor. The Federalists at
once called a preliminary caucus to decide whether they should support
Burr. Alexander Hamilton, who happened to be engaged in law business
at Albany, Feb. 16, 1804, attended the Federal caucus, and used his
influence in favor of the regular Clinton candidate against Burr’s
pretensions. The drift of his argument was given in an abstract of
reasons which he drew up for the occasion.[113] Unfortunately the
strongest of these reasons was evidently personal; the leadership of
Hamilton would not tolerate rivalry from Burr. Hamilton pointed out
that Burr’s elevation by the Federalists of New York would present
him as their leader to the Federalists of New England, and would
assist him to disorganize New England if so disposed; that there “the
ill-opinion of Jefferson, and jealousy of the ambition of Virginia, is
no inconsiderable prop of good opinions; but these causes are leading
to an opinion that a dismemberment of the Union is expedient. It would
probably suit Mr. Burr’s views to promote this result,--to be the chief
of the Northern portion; and placed at the head of the State of New
York, no man would be more likely to succeed.”
If the Union was to be severed, Hamilton was the intended chief of the
Northern portion; but he wanted no severance that should leave the
germs of the democratic disease. His philosophy was that of George
Cabot, William Pitt, and Talleyrand; he waited for the whole country to
come to its senses and restore sound principles, that democracy might
everywhere die out or be stifled. Burr’s methods were democratic, and
would perpetuate in a Northern confederacy the vices of the Union; they
would break up the conservative strength without weakening democracy.
Within a few days the danger which Hamilton foresaw came to pass.
Burr’s little band of friends in the Legislature, Feb. 18, 1804, set
him in nomination; and a large majority of Federalists, in defiance of
Hamilton’s entreaties, meant to vote for him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account