History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 2 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
As the situation became clearer, Hamilton’s personal feeling became
public. While at Albany, February 16, he dined with Judge Taylor,
and at table talked of the political prospect. One of the company,
Dr. Charles D. Cooper, an active partisan, wrote an account of the
conversation to a certain Mr. Brown near Albany: “General Hamilton and
Judge Kent have declared, in substance, that they looked upon Mr. Burr
to be a dangerous man, and one who ought not to be trusted with the
reins of government.” The letter was printed, and went the rounds of
the press. As it roused some question and dispute, Cooper wrote again:
“I could detail to you a still more despicable opinion which General
Hamilton has expressed of Mr. Burr.” This letter also was printed; the
“Albany Register” of April 24 contained the correspondence.
The news of Burr’s nomination reached Washington at the moment when
Pickering and Tracy received answers to their disunion scheme; and
it served to keep them steady to their plan. The Federalists, who
professed to consider Hamilton their leader, seldom followed his
advice; but on this occasion they set him somewhat unkindly aside. Too
much in awe of Hamilton to say directly to his face that he must be
content with the place of Burr’s lieutenant, they wrote letters to that
effect which were intended for his eye.
Of all Federalist leaders, moderate and extreme, Rufus King, who had
recently returned from London, stood highest in the confidence of his
party. He was to be the Federalist candidate for Vice-President; he had
mixed in none of the feuds which made Hamilton obnoxious to many of his
former friends; and while King’s manners were more conciliatory, his
opinions were more moderate, than those of other party leaders. To him
Pickering wrote, March 4, 1804, in a tone of entreaty:--
“I am disgusted with the men who now rule, and with their
measures. At some manifestations of their malignancy I am
shocked. The cowardly wretch at their head, while like a
Parisian revolutionary monster prating about humanity, would
feel an infernal pleasure in the utter destruction of his
opponents.”
After avowing his hopes of disunion, Pickering next touched the New
York election:[114]--
“The Federalists here in general anxiously desire the election
of Mr. Burr to the chair of New York, for they despair of a
present ascendency of the Federalist party. Mr. Burr alone, we
think, can break your democratic phalanx, and we anticipate much
good from his success. Were New York detached, as under his
administration it would be, from the Virginia influence, the
whole Union would be benefited. Jefferson would then be forced
to observe some caution and forbearance in his measures. And
if a separation should be deemed proper, the five New England
States, New York, and New Jersey would naturally be united.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account