History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Of all the old Republican arguments for a policy of peace, the
commonest was that a standing army would be dangerous, not to foreign
enemies, but to popular liberties; yet the first use of the new army
and gunboats was against fellow-citizens. New England was chiefly
controlled by the navy; but in New York the army was needed and was
employed. Open insurrection existed there. Besides forcible resistance
offered to the law, no one was ignorant that the collectors shut
their eyes to smuggling, and that juries, in defiance of court and
President, refused to indict rioters. Governor Tompkins announced
that Oswego was in active insurrection, and called on the President
to issue a proclamation to that effect.[213] Jefferson replied by
offering to take into the United States service the militia required
to suppress the riots, and begged Governor Tompkins to lead his
troops in person. “I think it so important in example to crush these
audacious proceedings and to make the offenders feel the consequences
of individuals daring to oppose a law by force, that no effort should
be spared to compass this object.”[214]
When permission was asked to establish a packet on Lake Champlain,
“I do not think this is a time,” replied Jefferson, “for opening new
channels of intercourse with Canada and multiplying the means of
smuggling.”[215] The people who lived on the shores of Lake Champlain
might object to such interference in their affairs, but could not deny
the force of Jefferson’s reasoning. Another application of a different
kind was rejected on grounds that seemed to give to the President
general supervision over the diet of the people:--
“The declaration of the bakers of New York that their citizens will
be dissatisfied, under the present circumstances of their country,
to eat bread of the flour of their own State, is equally a libel on
the produce and citizens of the State.... If this prevails, the next
application will be for vessels to go to New York for the pippins of
that State, because they are higher flavored than the same species of
apples growing in other States.”[216]
The same sumptuary rule applied to Louisiana. “You know I have been
averse to letting Atlantic flour go to New Orleans merely that they
may have the _whitest_ bread possible.”[217]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account