History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Chief-Justice Marshall had read Canning’s insulting note of September
23 more than a month before this letter to Pickering was written; yet
the idea of resenting it seemed not to enter his mind. Napoleon alone
was the terror of Federalism; and this unreasoning fear exercised upon
Marshall’s calm judgment hardly less power than upon the imagination
of Fisher Ames or the austerity of Timothy Pickering. Second only to
Marshall, Rufus King was the foremost of Federalists; and the same
horror of France which blinded Marshall, Ames, and Pickering to the
conduct of England led King to hold the President responsible for
Napoleon’s violence. December 1, 1808, King wrote to Pickering a long
letter containing views which in result differed little from those of
Nicholas and Monroe. The Berlin Decree, he said, had violated treaty
rights:[304]
“How dare then our Government with this document before them,
to affirm and endeavor to impose upon the country so gross a
misstatement as they have done in reference to this French Decree?
The Berlin Decree, being an infringement of our rights, should
have been resisted, as a similar decree of the Directory was
resisted by the Federalists in 1798. Had we so done, there would
have been no Orders in Council, no embargo, and probably before
this we should have been again in peace with France.... We are now
told that the embargo must be continued or the country disgraced.
Admitting the alternative, how shameful is it--how criminal rather,
might I say--that the men who have brought the country to this
condition should have the effrontery to make this declaration! The
Administration will be disgraced by the repeal, and they deserve to
be; perhaps they merit more than disgrace. But will the continuance
of the embargo save the country from disgrace? As to its effect on
France and England, we have sufficient evidence of its inefficacy.
The longer it is continued, the deeper our disgrace when it is
raised. It is earnestly to be hoped that the Federalists will leave
to the Administration and its supporters all projects by way of
substitute to the embargo. Having plunged the nation into its present
embarrassment, let them bear the whole responsibility for their
measures. The embargo must be repealed. That simple, unqualified
measure must be adopted. It is high time to discard visionary
experiments. For God’s sake, let the Federalists abstain from any
share in them!”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account