History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Story took no part in the public struggle, for he left Washington
about January 20, and the great debate began ten days afterward; but
although he held his peace in public, and his friends made no open
display of their anger, the temper in which they acted was notorious,
and the breach between them and Jefferson was never healed. They could
not forgive him: that Jefferson should ever forget the wound they
inflicted, required magnanimity beyond that of any philosopher known
in politics.
As soon as the naval and military bills and the extra session for May
22 were at last fairly determined and every detail decided, Wilson
Cary Nicholas took the lead of the House, and January 30 called up a
Resolution intended to settle the policy of embargo and war. The words
of this Resolve were too serious not to have received very careful
attention:
“_Resolved_, As the opinion of this House, that the United States
ought not to delay beyond the ---- day of ---- to resume, maintain,
and defend the navigation of the high seas; and that provision ought
to be made by law for repealing on the ---- day of ---- the several
embargo laws, and for authorizing at the same time letters of marque
and reprisal against Great Britain and France, provided on that day
their Orders or Edicts violating the lawful commerce and neutral
rights of the United States shall be in force; or against either of
those nations having in force such Orders or Edicts.”
Nicholas agreed to divide the Resolution so that a test vote might
first be taken on the repeal of the embargo; and he then moved to fill
the blank with the words, “the first day of June.” The House was thus
asked to pledge itself that on June 1 the embargo should cease. On
this question the debate began.
David R. Williams was a typical Carolinian. With something of
the overbearing temper which marked his class, he had also the
independence and the honesty which went far to redeem their failings.
He had stood for years, with his friend Macon, proof against the
influence of patronage and power; he supported the embargo, and was
not ashamed to avow his dread of war; but since his favorite measure
was to be thrown aside, he stood by his character, and made an appeal
to the House, giving at once to the debate an air of dignity which it
never wholly lost:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account