History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
No one could say for how much of this extravagance Canning was directly
responsible; but the tone of the press was certainly an echo of the
tone he had so long taken, and which he stimulated. That he was really
so reckless as he seemed need not be imagined; although eighteen months
afterward, Lord Grenville with the utmost emphasis said in the House of
Lords,[48] “I do firmly believe that it is the object of his Majesty’s
ministers to do everything in their power to force America into
hostility with this country.” Lord Grenville occasionally exaggerated,
and he was probably mistaken in this instance; but he found it possible
to believe ministers capable of acting with the motive he charged on
them. In truth he had strong ground for the opinion he held, which was
by no means peculiar to him. As early as July 27, 1807, the “Morning
Chronicle,” in announcing the first news of the “Chesapeake” affair,
added:--
“We trust it is of a nature to be adjusted without that most ruinous
of all follies yet left us to be guilty of,--an American war. We have
rather more fear than hope however on the subject, when we reflect
that the present ministers are of those who consider an American war
as rather desirable.”
Within a short time the “Morning Post” avowed and proclaimed, in
articles evidently inspired by Government, the wish for war with
America:[49]--
“A war of a very few months, without creating to us the expense of a
single additional ship, would be sufficient to convince her of her
folly by a necessary chastisement of her insolence and audacity.”
In January, 1808, the same newspaper spoke even more plainly:[50]--
“For us, we have always been of the opinion that in the present temper
of the American government no relations of amity can be maintained
with that nation unless at the expense of our dearest rights and most
essential interests.”
Perhaps this tone was taken partly with the idea of terrifying the
Americans into obedience; but beyond question a strong party leaned to
violence. Monroe, who had the best means of knowing, felt no doubts on
this point, and warned the President of the danger to the United States.
“There has been,” he wrote Aug. 4, 1807,[51] “at all times since the
commencement of the present war, a strong party here for extending its
ravages to them. This party is composed of the shipowners, the navy,
the East and West India merchants, and certain political characters
of great consideration in the State. So powerful is this combination
that it is most certain that nothing can be obtained of the government
on any point but what may be extorted by necessity.”
Insane as such a policy might seem, Lord Grenville’s charge against
ministers had solid ground.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account