History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Russell’s note of December 17 was never answered by the French
government, and, as was equally natural, it was never published by
the President or made known to Congress. Fortunately for Russell,
the Emperor was in good humor, and Cadore was in haste to convey his
master’s wishes to the American _chargé d’affaires_. December
22 Russell was summoned to the minister, and a very interesting
interview took place. Cadore gently complained of the tone in which
Russell’s note had been written, but put into his hands, as its result
and answer, the two letters written by the ministers of Justice and
Finance,--which allowed American vessels to enter French ports, subject
only to provisional sequestration, until February 2, at which time
all vessels sequestered since November 1 would be restored. “When I
had read these letters,” reported Russell,[300] “I returned them to
the Duke of Cadore, and expressed to him my regret that the general
release of American vessels detained under the Berlin and Milan Decrees
should be deferred until the 2d of February, as this delay might throw
some doubt on the revocation of those decrees.” Cadore replied that
the time thus taken was intended to afford an opportunity for forming
some general rule by which the character of the property could be
decided. Russell then complained that by assigning the second day of
February,--the very day on which the non-intercourse with England would
be revived,--this event was made to appear as a condition precedent to
the abrogation of the French edicts; and thereby the order in which the
measures of the two governments ought to stand was reversed. In reply
Cadore repeated the general assurances of the friendly disposition
of the Emperor, and that he was determined to favor the trade of the
United States so far as it did not cover or promote the commerce of
England. He said the Berlin and Milan Decrees, “inasmuch as they
related to the United States,” were at an end; that the Emperor was
pleased with what the United States had already done, but that he could
not “throw himself into their arms” until they had accomplished their
undertaking.
Nothing could be more gentle than this manner of saying that the
revocation of November 1 was and was not founded on a condition
precedent; that the decrees themselves were and were not revoked; but
when Russell still pressed for a categorical answer, Cadore declared at
last, “with some vivacity, that the Emperor was determined to persevere
in his system against England; that he had overturned the world in
adopting this system, and that he would overturn it again to give it
effect.” On the third point Cadore was equally unyielding. Not a word
could Russell wring from him in regard to the confiscated property of
American merchants. “His omission to notice the last is more to be
lamented, as I have reason to believe that this conversation was meant
to form the only answer I am to receive to the communications which I
have addressed to him.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account