History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison — John Shaqi
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 5 (of 9) : $b During the first administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
Even in Pennsylvania, although nothing shook the fixed political
character of the State, the epidemic of faction broke out. While the
legislatures of Massachusetts and Connecticut declared Acts of Congress
unconstitutional, and refused aid to execute them, the legislature
of Pennsylvania authorized Governor Snyder to resist by armed force
a mandate of the Supreme Court; and when the United States marshal
attempted to serve process on the person of certain respondents at the
suit of Gideon Olmstead, he found himself stopped by State militia
acting under orders.
In a country where popular temper had easier means of concentrating
its violence, government might have been paralyzed by these proofs
of low esteem; but America had not by far reached such a stage, and
dark as the prospect was both within and without, Madison could safely
disregard dangers on which most rulers had habitually to count. His
difficulties were only an inheritance from the old Administration,
and began to disappear as quickly as they had risen. At a word
from the President the State of Pennsylvania recovered its natural
common-sense, and with some little sacrifice of dignity gave way. The
popular successes won by the Federalists were hardly more serious than
the momentary folly of Pennsylvania. As yet, the Union stood in no
danger. The Federalists gained many votes; but these were the votes
of moderate men who would desert their new companions on the first
sign of a treasonable act, and their presence tended to make the party
cautious rather than rash. John Henry, the secret agent of Sir James
Craig, reported with truth to the governor-general that the Federalist
leaders at Boston found disunion a very delicate topic, and that “an
unpopular war ... can alone produce a sudden separation of any section
of this country from the common head.”[10] In public, the most violent
Federalists curbed their tongues whenever the Union was discussed, and
instead of threatening to dissolve it, contented themselves by charging
the blame on the Southern States in case it should fall to pieces.
Success sobered them; the repeal of the embargo seemed so great a
triumph that they were almost tempted into good humor.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account