History of the WaldensesWylie, J. A. (James Aitken)
History
History of the Waldenses
Wylie, J. A. (James Aitken)
Church history -- Middle Ages, 600-1500; Waldenses
Behind this rampart of mountains, which Providence, foreseeing the
approach of evil days, would almost seem to have reared on purpose, did
the remnant of the early apostolic Church of Italy kindle their lamp,
and here did that lamp continue to burn all through the long night
which descended on Christendom. There is a singular concurrence of
evidence in favour of their high antiquity. Their traditions invariably
point to an unbroken descent from the earliest times, as regards
their religious belief. The _Nobla Leyçon_, which dates from the year
1100,[2] goes to prove that the Waldenses of Piedmont did not owe their
rise to Peter Waldo of Lyons, who did not appear till the latter half
of that century (1160). The _Nobla Leyçon_ though a poem, is in reality
a confession of faith, and could have been composed only after some
considerable study of the system of Christianity, in contradistinction
to the errors of Rome. How could a Church have arisen with such a
document in her hands? Or how could these herdsmen and vine-dressers,
shut up in their mountains, have detected the errors against which
they bore testimony, and found their way to the truths of which they
made open profession in times of darkness like these? If we grant
that their religious beliefs were the heritage of former ages, handed
down from an evangelical ancestry, all is plain; but if we maintain
that they were the discovery of the men of those days, we assert what
approaches almost to a miracle. Their greatest enemies, Claude Seyssel
of Turin (1517), and Reynerius the Inquisitor (1250), have admitted
their antiquity, and stigmatised them as “the most dangerous of all
heretics, because the most ancient.”
Rorenco, Prior of St. Roch, Turin (1640), was employed to investigate
the origin and antiquity of the Waldenses, and of course had access to
all the Waldensian documents in the ducal archives, and being their
bitter enemy he may be presumed to have made his report not more
favourable than he could help. Yet he states that “they were not a new
sect in the ninth and tenth centuries, and that Claude of Turin must
have detached them from the Church in the ninth century.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account