History of the War in Afghanistan, Vol. 2 (of 3): Third Edition — John Shaqi
History of the War in Afghanistan, Vol. 2 (of 3): Third EditionKaye, John William, Sir
History
History of the War in Afghanistan, Vol. 2 (of 3): Third Edition
Kaye, John William, Sir
Afghan Wars
“We are now arrived at a crisis which calls for the most serious
consideration. If such a course should suit the convenience of
government, I should say that a vigorous policy now is that which
ought to be pursued. It is, indeed, in my opinion, by such a course
alone that our interests can be secured, and your Lordship’s past
policy justified. By annexing Herat to the crown of Caubul, and by
insisting upon the concession of our rights from the ruler of the
Punjab, your Lordship will at once provide for the consolidation of
Shah Soojah’s power, and show to the world that the attainment of
all the advantages contemplated from the movement across the Indus,
has been hitherto opposed only by the perfidious intrigues of the
two powers professing to be our friends and allies. In addition to
the demands already made upon the Sikhs, they should be required, I
think, to admit unequivocally our right of way across the Punjab, and
in the event of their denying this right, they should be convinced
that we can take it. I confess myself utterly ignorant of what
political objections may exist to this course of proceeding, or of
the military means that may be available; and I am much staggered at
a paper which I have just seen from Captain Sanders, who talks of its
being expedient to take 12,000 men against Herat. I believe, however,
that military authorities seldom underrate the difficulties to be
encountered. This paper will, I believe, be sent to your Lordship by
Sir W. Cotton. I have a proposition from Captain Bean to recognise the
right of Mehrab Khan’s son to the musnud of Khelat. This I think might
be done, if he would come and pay homage in person to Shah Soojah, as
Shah Narwaz can never be re-instated. But I shall tell Captain Bean
to keep the question open if possible, until I know your Lordship’s
views regarding Herat. If it be intended to send a large force into
the country with a view of reducing Herat, the Khelat affair will
afford an excellent screen to our intentions. I must beg your Lordship
most earnestly, if possible, to relieve the two European and five
Native regiments now in this neighbourhood. They are inefficient and
worn out, and both officers and men are grumbling and discontented. In
the present state of affairs it would be very hazardous to admit of
their return, unless their places were filled by fresh troops, and a
relief would enable us to settle with promptitude the Bajor affairs,
and to place our relations with the Khyburees on a firmer basis. Then,
should Dost Mahomed come in, he will have to be be sent to India, and
in the present state of Sikh feeling, I doubt if it would be prudent
to send him across the Punjab with only a regiment for his escort.
We have a rumour very generally credited, that Colonel Stoddart has
been poisoned by the Ameer of Bokhara, but I yet hope that it will
prove incorrect. On the Ghilzye affairs alluded to in your Lordship’s
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account