History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The execution of the convention had not been carried on thus far
without much trouble and contestation. Lord Proby, the English
commissioner appointed to carry the articles of the treaty into
effect, was joined by major-general Beresford on the 5th, and their
united labours were scarcely sufficient to meet the exigencies
of a task in the prosecution of which disputes hourly arose.
Anger, the cupidity of individuals, and opportunity, combined
to push the French beyond the bounds of honour and decency, and
several gross attempts were made to appropriate property which
no interpretation of the stipulations could give a colour to;
amongst the most odious were the abstraction of manuscripts and
rare specimens of natural history from the national museum, and the
invasion of the deposito publico, or funds of money awaiting legal
decision for their final appropriation. Those dishonest attempts
were met and checked with a strong hand, and at last a committee,
consisting of an individual of each of the three nations, was
appointed by the commissioners on both sides. Their office was to
receive reclamations, to investigate them, and to do justice by
seizing upon all contraband baggage embarked by the French. This
measure was attended with excellent effect. It must, however, be
observed, that the loud complaints and violence of the Portuguese,
and the machinations of the bishop of Oporto, seem to have excited
the suspicions of the British, and influenced their actions more
than the real facts warranted; for the national character of the
Portuguese was not then understood, nor the extent to which they
supplied the place of true reports, by the fabrication of false
ones, generally known. Writers have not been wanting to exaggerate
the grounds of complaint. The English have imputed fraud, and
evasions of the most dishonourable kind to the French, and the
latter have retorted by accusations of gratuitous insult and breach
of faith, asserting that their soldiers when on board the British
ships were treated with cruelty in order to induce them to desert.
It would be too much to affirm that all the error was on one side,
but it does appear reasonable and consonant to justice to decide,
that as the French were originally aggressors and acting for
their own interest, and that the British were interfering for the
protection of the Portuguese, any indecorous zeal upon the part
of the latter, if not commendable, was certainly more excusable
than in their opponents. Upon the ground of its being evidently
impossible for him to know what was doing in his name, the British
commissioners acquitted Junot of any personal impropriety of
conduct, and his public orders, which denounced severe punishments
for such malpractices, corroborated this testimony; yet Kellerman,
in his communications with sir Hew Dalrymple, did not scruple to
insinuate matter to the duke’s disadvantage. But, amidst all these
conflicting accusations, the British commander’s personal good
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account