History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Thus prepared for some cabal, sir Hew Dalrymple was at no loss
for an answer to Freire’s remonstrance. He observed, that if the
government of Portugal had not been mentioned in the treaty,
neither had that of England nor that of France. The convention was
purely military, and for the present concerned only the commanders
in the field. With regard to the occupation of the fortresses, and
the fact of the British army being an auxiliary force, the first
was merely a measure of military precaution absolutely necessary,
and the latter was in no way rendered doubtful by any act which
had been committed; he sir Hew was instructed by his government to
assist in restoring the prince regent of Portugal to his lawful
rights, without any secret or interested motives; finally, the
Portuguese general had been invited to assist in the negotiations,
and if he had not done so, the blame rested with himself. And to
this sir Hew might have justly added, that the conduct of Freire in
withdrawing his troops at the most critical moment of the campaign,
by no means entitled him to assume a high tone towards those whom
he had so disgracefully deserted in the hour of danger.
The Portuguese general was silenced by this plain and decided
answer; but the English general was quickly convinced that the
bishop and his coadjutors, however incapable of conducting great
affairs, were experienced plotters. In his first interview with
Andrada, sir Hew Dalrymple had taken occasion to observe, that
“no government lawfully representing the prince regent actually
existed in Portugal.” In fact, a junta, calling itself independent,
was likewise established in Algarvé, and the members of the
regency legally invested by the prince with supreme authority
were dispersed, and part of them in the power of the French. This
observation, so adverse to the prelate’s views, was transmitted to
him by Freire, together with a copy of the armistice. The junta
were well aware that a definite convention, differing materially
from the armistice, was upon the point of being concluded, and that
the refusal of sir Charles Cotton to concur in the latter, had
rendered it null and void; but preserving silence on that point,
the bishop forwarded the copy of the armistice to the chevalier
Da Souza, Portuguese minister in London, accompanied by a letter
filled with invectives and misrepresentations of its provisions.
The chevalier placed this letter with its inclosures, in the hands
of Mr. Canning the English secretary of state for foreign affairs,
and at the same time delivered to him an official note in which,
adopting the style of the prelate and junta, he spoke of them as
the representatives of his sovereign, and the possessors of the
supreme power in Portugal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account