History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
But the efforts of the party were not confined to formal
communications with the ministers; the daily press teemed with
invectives against the English general’s conduct, and ex-parte
statements, founded on the provisions of an armistice that was
never concluded, being thus palmed upon the public, (always hasty
in judging of such matters), a prejudice against the convention
was raised before either the terms of, or the events which led to
it, were known. For, sir Hew, forgetting the ordinary forms of
official intercourse, neglected to transmit information to his
government until fifteen days after the commencement of the treaty,
and the ministers, unable to contradict or explain any of Souza’s
assertions, were placed in a mortifying situation, by which their
minds were irritated and disposed to take a prejudiced view of the
real treaty. Meanwhile the bishop pretended to know nothing of the
convention, hence the silence of Freire during the negotiations;
but those once concluded, a clamour was, by the party, raised
in Portugal, similar to that which they had already excited in
England; and thus both nations appeared to be equally indignant at
the conduct of the general, when, in fact, his proceedings were
unknown to either.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. 11.]
It would appear that the bishop had other than Portuguese
coadjutors. The baron Von Decken, a Hanoverian officer, was
appointed one of the military agents at Oporto: he was subject to
sir Hew Dalrymple’s orders, but as his mission was of a detached
nature, he was also to communicate directly with the secretary
of state in England. Von Decken arrived at Oporto upon the 17th
August, and the same evening, in concert with the bishop, concocted
a project admirably adapted to forward the views of the latter;
they agreed that the prelate was the fittest person to be at the
head of the government, and that as he could not, or pretended
that he could not, quit Oporto, the seat of government ought to be
transferred to that city. But two obstacles to this arrangement
were foreseen; first, the prince regent at his departure had
nominated a regency, and left full instructions for the filling
up of vacancies arising from death or other causes; secondly, the
people of Lisbon and of the southern provinces would certainly
resist any plan for changing the seat of government. To obviate
these difficulties, Von Decken wrote largely in commendation of
the proposed arrangement, vilifying the conduct of the regency,
and urging sir Hew not only to give his sanction to the ambitious
project, but to employ the British troops in controlling the
people of Lisbon should they attempt to frustrate the bishop’s
plans. To conciliate the members of the regency, it was proposed
to admit a portion of them into the new government, and Francisco
Noronha, Francisco da Cunha, the Monteiro Mor, and the principal
Castro, were named as being the only men who were faithful to
their sovereign.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account