History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The accession of strength which this treaty, and the manifest
personal partiality of Alexander, gave to the French emperor,
inspired him perhaps with the idea, that the English cabinet would,
if a fair occasion offered, gladly enter into negotiations for a
general peace. The two emperors wrote a joint letter to the king
of England. “The circumstances of Europe had,” they said, “brought
them together; their first thought was to yield to the wish and
the wants of every people, and to seek, in a speedy pacification,
the most efficacious remedy for the miseries which oppressed all
nations. The long and bloody war which had torn the continent was
at an end, without the possibility of being renewed. Many changes
had taken place in Europe, many states had been overthrown; the
cause was to be found in the state of agitation and misery in
which the stagnation of maritime commerce had placed the greatest
nations: still greater changes might yet take place, and all of
them contrary to the policy of the English nation. Peace, then,
was, at once, the interest of the people of the continent, as it
was the interest of the people of Great Britain. We entreat your
majesty,” they concluded, “we unite to entreat your majesty to
listen to the voice of humanity, to silence that of the passions;
to seek, with the intention of arriving at that object, to
conciliate all interests, and thus preserve all powers which exist,
ensure the happiness of Europe and of this generation, at the head
of which Providence has placed us.”
To this joint letter Mr. Canning replied by two letters to the
French and Russian ministers, accompanied by an official note.
In that addressed to the Russian, he observed, that “however
desirous the king might be to reply personally to the emperor,
he was prevented, by the unusual mode of communication adopted,
which had deprived it of a private and personal character. It was
impossible to pay that mark of respect to the emperor, without at
the same time acknowledging titles which he had never acknowledged.
The proposition for peace would be communicated to Sweden, and to
the existing government of Spain. It was necessary that his majesty
should receive an immediate assurance, that France acknowledged
the government of Spain as a party to the negotiation. That such
was the intention of the emperor could not be doubted, when the
lively interest manifested by his imperial majesty for the welfare
and dignity of the Spanish monarchy was recollected. No other
assurance was wanted, that the emperor could not have been induced
to sanction by his concurrence or approbation, usurpations, the
principles of which were not less unjust than their example was
dangerous to all legitimate sovereigns.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account