History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The letter addressed to Mons. de Champagny, duke of Cadore, merely
reiterated the claim for Sweden and Spain being admitted as parties
to the negotiation. The official note commenced by stating the
king’s desire for peace, on terms consistent with his honour, his
fidelity to his engagements, and the permanent repose of Europe.
The miserable condition of the continent, the convulsions it had
experienced, and those with which it was threatened, were not
imputable to his majesty. If the cause of so much misery was to be
found in the stagnation of commercial intercourse, although his
majesty could _not be expected to hear with unqualified regret_,
that the system devised for the destruction of the commerce of
his subjects had recoiled upon its authors or its instruments;
yet, as it was neither the disposition of his majesty, nor in the
character of the people over whom he reigned to rejoice in the
privations and unhappiness even of the nations which were combined
against him, he anxiously desired the termination of the sufferings
of the continent. The note, after stating that the progress of the
war had imposed new obligations upon Great Britain, claimed for
Sicily, for Portugal, for Sweden, and for Spain, a participation
in the negotiations. Treaties, it stated, existed with the three
first, which bound them and England in peace and war. With Spain
indeed no formal instrument had yet been executed, but the ties
of honour were, to the king of England, as strong as the most
solemn treaties; wherefore it was assumed, that the central junta,
or government of Spain, was understood to be a party to any
negotiation, in which his majesty was invited to engage.
The reply of Russia was peremptory. The claims of the sovereigns,
allies of Great Britain, she would readily admit. But the
insurgents of Spain, Russia would not acknowledge as an independent
power. The Russians (and England, it was said, could recollect
one particular instance) had always been true to this principle;
moreover, the emperor had acknowledged Joseph Buonaparte as king
of Spain, and was united to the French emperor for peace and for
war; he was resolved not to separate his interests from those of
Napoleon. After some further arguments touching the question, the
reply concluded by offering to treat upon the basis of the “uti
possidetis,” and the respective power of the belligerent parties,
or upon _any basis_; for the conclusion of an honourable, just, and
equal peace.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account