History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
1º. The disposition of the army, on both sides of the Douro, and
upon such extended lines, when no certain advice of the movements
and strength of the English force had been received, was rash. It
was, doubtless, right, that to clear the front of the army, and
to gather information, Franceschi should advance to the Vouga;
but he remained too long in the same position, and he should
have felt Trant’s force more positively. Had the latter officer
(whose boldness in maintaining the line of the Vouga was extremely
creditable) been beaten, as he easily might have been, the anarchy
in the country would have increased; and as Beresford’s troops at
Thomar wanted but an excuse to disband themselves, the Portuguese
and British preparations must have been greatly retarded.
[Sidenote: Noble’s Campagne de Galice.]
2º. That Soult, when he had secured, as he thought, all the boats
on an unfordable river three hundred yards wide, should think
himself safe from an attack for one day, is not wonderful. The
improbability that such a barrier could be forced in half an
hour might have rendered Fabius careless; but there were some
peculiar circumstances attending the surprise of the French army
which indicate great negligence. The commanding officer of one
regiment reported, as early as six o’clock, that the English were
crossing the river; the report was certainly premature, because
no man passed before ten o’clock; but it reached Soult, and he
sent general Quesnel, the governor of Oporto, to verify the fact.
Quesnel stated, on his return, and truly, that it was an error,
and Soult took no further precaution. The patroles were not
increased; no staff-officers appear to have been employed to watch
the river, and no signals were established; yet it was but three
days since D’Argenton’s conspiracy had been discovered, and the
extent of it was still unknown. This circumstance alone should have
induced the duke of Dalmatia to augment the number of his guards
and posts of observation, that the multiplicity of the reports
might render it impossible for the malcontents to deceive him. The
surprise at Oporto must, therefore, be considered as a fault in the
general, which could only be atoned for by the high resolution and
commanding energy with which he saved his army in the subsequent
retreat.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account