History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
If he demanded food for his troops, he was answered by false
statements of what had been supplied, and falser promises of what
would be done; and the glorious services rendered at Talavera, far
from exciting the gratitude or calling forth the activity of the
Spanish authorities, seemed only to render them the more perverse.
The soldiers in the ranks were weakened by hunger, the sick were
dying for want of necessary succours, the commissaries were without
the means of transport; and when sir Arthur Wellesley applied for
only ninety artillery horses to supply the place of those killed
in the action, Cuesta, on the very field of battle, and with the
steam of the English blood still reeking in his nostrils, refused
this request, and, two days after, abandoned the wounded men to an
enemy that he and his countrymen were hourly describing as the most
ferocious and dishonourable of mankind.
The retreat of the allies across the Tagus increased the sufferings
of the troops, and the warmth of their general’s remonstrances
rose in proportion to the ill-treatment they experienced; but
the replies, nothing abating in falseness as to fact, now became
insulting both to the general and his army: “_The British were
not only well but over supplied_:”--“_they robbed the peasantry,
pillaged the villages, intercepted the Spanish convoys, and openly
sold the provisions thus shamefully acquired_:”--“_the retreat of
the army across the Tagus was unnecessary; Soult ought to have been
destroyed; and the English general must have secret motives for his
conduct, which he dare not avouch_:”--and other calumnies of the
like nature.
Now, from the 20th of July to the 20th of August, although the
Spaniards were generally well fed, the English soldiers had not
received ten full rations. Half a pound of wheat in the grain, and,
twice a week, a few ounces of flour, with a quarter of a pound of
goat’s flesh, formed the sole subsistence of men and officers; and
this scanty supply was procured with much labour, for the goats
were to be caught and killed by the troops; and it was, perhaps,
upon this additional hardship that the accusation of selling
provisions was founded, for, in such cases, it is in all armies the
custom that the offal belongs to the men who slaughter the animals.
But the famine in the camp was plainly proved by this very fact;
for a goat’s offal sold, at this time, for three and even four
dollars, or about double the usual price of the whole animal; and
men and officers strove to outbid each other for the wretched food.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. 18.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account