History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 2
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The line of resistance may, therefore, be said to have extended
from the Sierra Morena to Coruña--weak from its length; weaker,
that the allied corps, being separated by mountains, by rivers,
and by vast tracts of country, and having different bases of
operation, such as Lisbon, Seville, and Ciudad Rodrigo, could not
act in concert, except offensively; and with how little effect in
that way the campaign of Talavera had proved. But the French were
concentrated in a narrow space, and, having only Madrid to cover,
were advantageously situated for offensive or defensive movements.
The allied forces were, for the most part, imperfectly organized,
and would not, altogether, have amounted to ninety thousand
fighting men. The French were above one hundred thousand, dangerous
from their discipline and experience, more dangerous that they held
a central position, and that their numbers were unknown to their
opponents; and, moreover, having, in four days, gained one general
and two minor battles, their courage was high and eager.
[Sidenote: See Calvo Garray and Lord Wellesley’s Correspondence,
Parl. Papers, 1810.]
At this period, by the acknowledgement of the Spaniards themselves,
the fate of the country depended entirely upon the British troops,
and, doubtless, the latter were soldiers of no ordinary stamp;
but there is a limit to human power, in war as well as in other
matters. Sir Arthur Wellesley was at the head of some seventeen
thousand men, of all arms, and about five thousand were somewhere
between Lisbon and Alcantara: but the whole French army could, in
two days, have been concentrated in the valley of the Tagus. Soult,
alone, of all the associated generals, appears to have viewed this
crisis with the eye of a great commander. Had he been permitted
to follow up the attack at Arzobispo, on the 8th of August, what
could the seventeen thousand starving British troops, encumbered
with the terror-stricken Spaniards, have effected against the
seventy thousand French that would have stormed their positions on
three sides at once? The hardy, enduring English infantry might,
indeed, have held their ground in one battle, but could they
have fought a second? Would not a movement of the first corps by
Guadalupe, would not famine alone, have forced the ten or twelve
thousand men remaining (if, indeed, so many were left) to abandon
the banks of the Tagus, to abandon, also, their parcs of ammunition
and their wounded men, and to retreat towards Portugal; and to
retreat, also, with little hope, harassed, as they would have been,
by six thousand horsemen, for Soult had eighteen regiments of
cavalry?
[Sidenote: Parl. Pap. 1810.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account