History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Nevertheless, the first effects of the decree establishing this
system, were injurious to the French cause. Fresh contributions were
exacted to supply the deficiency occasioned by the cessation of
succours from France; and, to avoid these, men, who would otherwise
have submitted tranquilly, fled from the military governments. The
Partidas also suddenly and greatly increased, and a fresh difficulty
arose about their treatment when prisoners. These bodies, although
regardless of the laws of war themselves, claimed all the rights of
soldiers from their adversaries, and their claim was supported by
the Spanish government. Thus, when Soult, as major-general for the
king, proclaimed that military execution would be done on the bands
in Andalusia, as assassins, and beyond the pale of military law, the
Regency answered, by a retaliatory declaration; and both parties had
strong grounds for what they did: the Junta, because the defence of
the country now rested chiefly on the Partidas; Joseph, because the
latter, while claiming the usages of war, did not act upon them, and
were, by the Junta, encouraged in assassination. Mina, and, indeed,
all the chiefs, put their prisoners to death whenever it became
inconvenient to keep them; and Saraza publicly announced his hope of
being able to capture Madame Suchet when she was pregnant, that he
might destroy the mother and the infant together! And such things
were common during this terrible war. The difficulties occurring
in argument were, however, overcome in practice; the question of
the treatment of the prisoners was generally decided by granting no
quarter on either side.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. IV. Section 2.]
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. IV. Section 5.]
Joseph, incensed at the edict establishing the governments, sent the
marquis of Almenara to Paris, to remonstrate with his brother, and to
complain of the violence and the injustice of the French generals,
especially Ney and Kellerman; and he denounced one act of the latter,
which betrayed the most wanton contempt of justice and propriety;
namely, the seizure of the national archives at Simancas; by which,
infinite confusion was produced, and the utmost indignation excited,
without obtaining the slightest benefit, political or military.
Another object of Almenara’s mission was to ascertain if there was
really any intention of seizing the provinces beyond the Ebro; and
this gave rise to a curious intrigue; for his correspondence, being
intercepted, was brought to Mr. Stuart, the British envoy, and he,
in concert with Romana, and Cabanes the Spanish historian, simulated
the style and manner of Napoleon’s state-papers, and composed a
counterfeit “_senatus consultum_” and decree for annexing the
provinces beyond the Ebro to France, and transmitted them to Joseph,
whose discontent and fears were thereby greatly increased. Meanwhile,
his distress for money was extreme; and his ministers were at times
actually destitute of food.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account