History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 3
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
3º. Massena should have brought the allies to action in a forward
position; and he might have done so either when Almeida fell, or
before that event, because the complement of mules for the service
of the army not being then full, the commissariat was dependent
upon the country carts; and when the first retrograde movement took
place from Alverca, the drivers fled with their animals, producing
infinite confusion in the rear. The commissary-general Kennedy
contrived, indeed, to procure fifteen hundred additional mules; but,
intermediately, a brisk advance of the enemy would have forced the
English general to fight, or retire more hastily than would have
beseemed his reputation, or suited his political position.
4º. If the prince of Esling had not been misled by Alorna and
Pamplona, and the more readily that the estates of the latter were
situated about Coimbra, he would have judged that the line his
adversary had studied for eight months, and now so carefully and
jealously guarded, was more likely to afford advantages, than the
circuitous route by Viseu, which was comparatively neglected. The
French general, ill acquainted with the scene of action, but having
the stronger and more moveable army, should have followed closely.
A rapid pursuit, through Celerico, would have brought the French
army on to the Alva before Hill or even Leith could have joined
lord Wellington. The latter must then have fought with half his own
army, or he must have retreated to the Lines. If he offered battle,
his position could be turned either by the right or left; on the
left by the slopes of the Estrella, on the right by crossing the
Mondego, for Busaco was too extensive to be occupied before Hill
and Leith arrived. Now, the road by Viseu being the longest and
least practicable, demanded great diligence to compensate for the
difficulties of the way, and to gain Coimbra and force the allies
to a battle before Hill arrived, were objects more readily to be
attained by the left bank of the Mondego. The point where to strike
was therefore not “_well considered_,” and it is clear that Massena
did not rightly estimate the greatness of his enterprise.
5º. When the rocks of Busaco glittering with bayonets first rose on
the prince of Esling’s view, two fresh questions were to be solved.
Was he to attack or to turn that formidable post? Or, availing
himself of his numerical strength and central situation, was he to
keep the allies in check, seize Oporto, and neglect Lisbon until
better combinations could be made? The last question has been already
discussed; but, contrary to the general opinion, the attack upon
Busaco appears to me faulty in the execution rather than in the
conception; and the march by which that position was finally turned,
a violation of the soundest principles of war. In a purely military
view, the English general may be censured for not punishing his
adversary’s rashness.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account