History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Mr. Stuart and lord Wellington strongly objected to this change,
although they submitted to it as not wishing to appear regardless
of the prince regent’s rights. Mr. Stuart, however, reflecting that
a government composed of men having different views and feelings,
and without any casting vote, the number being even, could not go on
usefully, was at first averse to join the regency, but was finally
persuaded to do so by lord Wellington, who justly considered that his
presence there would give the only chance of success.
Doctor Nogueras’ appointment was described, by lord Strangford, as
a tribute to democracy, the object being to counteract the power of
those very secretariats which lord Wellington and Mr. Stuart were
labouring to preserve. But lord Strangford prided himself chiefly
upon the appointment of the principal Souza, who, he said, had been
recommended to him by Mr. Villiers, an avowal of great import, as
shewing at once the spirit of the new arrangement: for this Souza
had, in a subordinate situation, hitherto opposed every proceeding
of the British in Portugal; he was the avowed enemy of Beresford,
the contriver of all confusion, and the most mischievous person in
Portugal; and his absence from that country was so desirable, that
intimations to that effect had been formally given to him, by lord
Wellesley, through Mr. Stuart. This factious person was now, however,
armed with additional power, to thwart the English authorities in
Portugal, and thus lord Strangford’s diplomacy tended, in effect, to
ruin that cause which he had been sent to the Brazils to support.
[Sidenote: See Vol. II. Appendix.]
In relating these proceedings I have, following his own letter,
announcing the change, described lord Strangford as acting
voluntarily; but in a subsequent despatch he affirmed, that it
was under Mr. Canning’s instructions, he had pressed for this
incorporating of the British minister in the regency, and that
Nogueras’ appointment sprang entirely from the prince regent’s own
will, which he did not choose to oppose. In like manner, when lord
Wellesley was intent upon assembling a cortes, lord Strangford called
it “_a great and essential measure strongly and wisely urged by the
government_,” and yet afterwards acknowledged that he neglected to
press it, because he thought it “_useless and even hurtful_,” which
inconsistency renders it difficult to determine on whom these affairs
rested. As affecting Mr. Canning’s policy, however, it is to be
observed that if he originally arranged this change, his object was
to put Mr. Villiers in the regency, not with any view to the more
complete controul of Portugal for the purposes of war, but, as the
instructions to sir John Cradock prove, to ensure a preponderance to
the diplomatic department over the military in that country.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account