History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The principal reforms, in the administration, which had been
sought for by lord Wellington, were a better arrangement of the
financial system—the execution of the laws without favour to the
fidalgos—the suppression of the “_junta di viveres_,” a negligent
and fraudulent board, for which he wished to establish a Portuguese
commissariat—the due supply of provisions and stores, for the
national troops and fortresses—the consolidation of the arsenal
department under one head—the formation of a military chest,
distinct from the treasury, which was always diverting the funds to
other purposes—the enforcing of the regulations about the means of
transport—the repairs of the roads and bridges—the reformation of
the hospitals—the succouring of the starving people, and the revival
of agriculture in the parts desolated by the war.
These things he had hoped to accomplish; but from the moment the
change effected by lord Strangford took place, unceasing acrimonious
disputes ensued between the British commander and the Portuguese
government, and no species of falsehood or intrigue, not even
personal insult, and the writing of anonymous threatening letters,
were spared by the Souza faction. In the beginning of 1811 they
had organized an anti-English party, and a plot was laid to force
the British out of the country, which would have succeeded if less
vigilance had been used by Mr. Stuart, or less vigour of control
by lord Wellington. This plot however required that the patriarch
should go to the northern provinces, a journey which the envoy always
dexterously prevented.
[Sidenote: May.]
The first complaint of the British authorities, accompanied with a
demand for the removal of the principal Souza, reached the Brazils
in February 1811, and Das Minas died about the same time; but so
strongly was the faction supported at Rio de Janeiro, that in May,
the prince regent expressed his entire approval of the Souzas’
proceedings and his high displeasure with Forjas and Mr. Stuart. His
minister, the Conde de Linhares, wrote, that the capture of Massena
with his whole army, which he expected to hear of each day, would not
make amends for the destruction of the country during the retreat of
the allies; and in an official note to lord Strangford, he declared,
that the prince regent could not permit Mr. Stuart to vote in matters
concerning the internal government of the kingdom, because he was
influenced by, and consulted persons suspected of disaffection, which
expression lord Strangford said referred solely to Forjas.
[Sidenote: June.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account