History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
An assault on the castle breach might still have been tried, but the
troops could not have formed between the top, and the retrenchments
behind the breach, until Christoval was taken, and the guns from
thence used to clear the interior of the castle; hence the siege was
of necessity raised, because to take Christoval, required several
days more, and Soult was now ready to advance. The stores were
removed on the 10th, and the attack was turned into a blockade.
OBSERVATIONS.
1º. The allies lost, during this unfortunate siege, nearly four
hundred men and officers, and the whole of their proceedings were
against rules. The working parties were too weak, the guns and stores
too few, and the points of attack, chosen, not the best; the defences
were untouched by counter-batteries, and the breaching batteries were
at too great a distance for the bad guns employed; howitzers mounted
on trucks were but a poor substitute for mortars, and the sap was not
practised; lastly, the assaults were made before the glacis had been
crowned, and a musketry fire established against the breach.
2º. That a siege so conducted should fail against such a brave and
intelligent garrison is not strange; but it is most strange and
culpable that a government, which had been so long engaged in war as
the British, should have left the engineer department, with respect
to organization and equipment, in such a state as to make it, in
despite of the officers’ experience, bravery, and zeal, a very
inefficient arm of war. The skill displayed belonged to particular
persons, rather than to the corps at large; and the very tools with
which they worked, especially those sent from the storekeeper’s
department, were so shamefully bad that the work required could
scarcely be performed; the captured French cutting-tools were eagerly
sought for by the engineers as being infinitely better than the
British; when the soldiers’ lives and the honour of England’s arms,
were at stake, the English cutlery was found worse than the French.
3º. The neglect of rules, above noticed, was for the most part
a matter of absolute necessity; yet censure might attach to the
general, inasmuch as he could have previously sent to England for a
battering train. But then the conduct of the Portuguese and British
governments when lord Wellington was in the lines, left him so little
hope of besieging any place on the frontier, that he was hourly
in fear of being obliged to embark: moreover, the badness of the
Portuguese guns was not known, and the space of time that elapsed
between the fall of Badajos and this siege, was insufficient to
procure artillery from England; neither would the Portuguese have
furnished the means of carriage. It may however at all times be taken
as a maxim, that the difficulties of war are so innumerable that no
head was ever yet strong enough to fore-calculate them all.
CHAPTER VI.
[Sidenote: 1811. June.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account