History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
6º. Blake, like all the Spanish generals, indulged vast military
conceptions far beyond his means, and, from want of knowledge,
generally in violation of strategic principles. Thus his project
of cutting the communication with Madrid, invading Aragon, and
connecting Mina’s operations between Zaragoza and the Pyrenees, with
Lacy’s in Catalonia, was gigantic in design, but without any chance
of success. The division of Severoli being added to Musnier’s, had
secured Aragon; and if it had not been so, the reinforcements then
marching through Navarre, to different parts of Spain, rendered the
time chosen for these attempts peculiarly unfavourable. But the
chief objection was, that Blake had lost the favourable occasion
of protracting the war about Saguntum; and the operations against
Valencia, were sure to be brought to a crisis, before the affair
of Aragon could have been sufficiently embarrassing, to recal the
French general. The true way of using the large guerilla forces, was
to bring them down close upon the rear of Suchet’s army, especially
on the side of Teruel, where he had magazines; which could have
been done safely, because these Partidas had an open retreat, and
if followed would have effected their object, of weakening and
distressing the army before Valencia. This would have been quite a
different operation from that which Blake adopted, when he posted
Obispo and O’Donnel at Benaguazil and Segorbe; because those
generals’ lines of operations, springing from the Guadalaviar, were
within the power of the French; and this error alone proves that
Blake was entirely ignorant of the principles of strategy.
7º. Urged by the cries of the Valencian population, the Spanish
general delivered the battle of the 25th, which was another great
error, and an error exaggerated by the mode of execution. He who had
so much experience, who had now commanded in four or five pitched
battles, was still so ignorant of his art, that with twice as many
men as his adversary, and with the choice of time and place, he
made three simultaneous attacks, on an extended front, without any
connection or support; and he had no reserves to restore the fight or
to cover his retreat. A wide sweep of the net without regard to the
strength or fierceness of his prey, was Blake’s only notion, and the
result was his own destruction.
8º. Suchet’s operations, especially his advance against Saguntum,
leaving Oropesa behind him, were able and rapid. He saw the errors
of his adversary, and made them fatal. To fight in front of Saguntum
was no fault; the French general acted with a just confidence in his
own genius, and the valour of his troops. He gained that fortress by
the battle, but he acknowledged that such were the difficulties of
the siege, the place could only have been taken by a blockade, which
would have required two months.
CHAPTER III.
[Sidenote: 1811. Nov.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account