History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
After this Grant reached England and obtained permission to choose
a French officer of equal rank with himself, to send to France,
that no doubt might remain about the propriety of his escape; and
great was his astonishment to find, in the first prison he visited,
the old fisherman and his real son, who had meanwhile been captured
notwithstanding a protection given to them for their services. Grant,
whose generosity and benevolence were as remarkable as the qualities
of his understanding, soon obtained their release, and having
sent them with a sum of money to France returned himself to the
Peninsula, and within four months from the date of his first capture
was again on the Tormes, watching Marmont’s army! Other strange
incidents of his life I could mention, were it not more fitting to
quit a digression, already too wide; yet I was unwilling to pass an
occasion of noticing one adventure of this generous and spirited, and
yet gentle-minded man, who having served his country nobly and ably
in every climate, died, not long since, exhausted by the continual
hardships he had endured.
Having now shewn the prudence of lord Wellington with respect
to the campaign generally, it remains to consider the siege of
Badajos, which has so often been adduced in evidence, that not skill
but fortune plumed his ambitious wing; a proceeding indeed most
consonant to the nature of man; for it is hard to avow inferiority,
by attributing an action so stupendous to superior genius alone.
A critical scientific examination would be misplaced in a general
history, but to notice some of the leading points which involve
the general conception will not be irrelevant. The choice of the
line of attack has been justified by the English engineers, as that
requiring least expenditure of means and time; but this has by the
French engineer been denied. Colonel Lamarre affirms that the front
next the castle was the one least susceptible of defence; because
it had neither ravelin nor ditch to protect it, had fewer flanks,
and offered no facility of retrenching behind it; a view which is
confirmed by Phillipon, who being the best judge of his own weak
points, did for many days imagine that this front was the true
object of the allies’ approaches. But Lamarre advances a far more
interesting question, when he affirms that the English general might
have carried Badajos by escalade and storm, on the first night of
the siege, with less difficulty than he experienced on the 7th of
April. On that night, he says, the defences were not so complete,
that the garrison was less prepared, and the surprise would have
availed somewhat; whereas at the second period the breaches were the
strongest part of the town, and as no other advantage had been gained
by the besiegers, the chances were in favour of the first period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account