History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This reasoning appears sound, yet the fact is one which belongs, not
to the rules but the secrets of the art, and they are only in the
keeping of great captains. That the breaches were impregnable has
indeed been denied by the English engineers. Colonel Jones affirms
that the centre breach had not the slightest interior retrenchment,
and that the sword-blades in the Trinidad, might have been overturned
by the rush of a dense mass of troops. This opinion is quite at
variance with that of the officers and men engaged; it is certain
also that all the breaches were protected by the sword-blades,
and if the centre breach was not retrenched, it was rendered very
difficult of approach by the deep holes digged in front, and it was
more powerfully swept by flank fire than the others were. It is
also a mistake to suppose that no dense rush was made at the great
breach. Engineers intent upon their own art sometimes calculate on
men as they do on blocks of stone or timber, nevertheless where the
bullet strikes the man will fall. The sword-blades were fitted into
ponderous beams, and these last, chained together, were let deep into
the ground; how then was it possible for men to drag, or push them
from their places, when behind them stood resolute men, whose fire
swept the foremost ranks away? This fire could not be returned by the
soldiers engaged in removing the obstacles, nor by those in rear,
because, from the slope of the breach, they could only see their
own comrades of the front ranks; and then the dead bodies, and the
struggling wounded men, and still more the spiked planks, rendered a
simultaneous exertion impossible. The breaches were impregnable!
And why was all this striving in blood against insurmountable
difficulties? Why were men sent thus to slaughter, when the
application of a just science would have rendered the operation
comparatively easy? Because the English ministers, so ready to plunge
into war, were quite ignorant of its exigencies; because the English
people are warlike without being military, and under the pretence
of maintaining a liberty which they do not possess, oppose in peace
all useful martial establishments. Expatiating in their schools and
colleges, upon Roman discipline and Roman valour, they are heedless
of Roman institutions; they desire like that ancient republic, to be
free at home and conquerors abroad, but start at perfecting their
military system, as a thing incompatible with a constitution, which
they yet suffer to be violated by every minister who trembles at the
exposure of corruption. In the beginning of each war, England has to
seek in blood for the knowledge necessary to insure success, and like
the fiend’s progress toward Eden, her conquering course is through
chaos followed by death!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account