History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 4
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“_H. M. S. Amelia,_
“_Coruña, May 6, 1810._
“I have been cruizing for these two months past between Bayonne and
Santona.”
“In addition to the troops I have observed under arms, there has been
a great proportion of armed peasantry at Baquio, a small place to the
westward of Rachidaes; as our boats were returning from destroying
some batteries, they were attacked by armed peasantry alone, who were
dispersed by shot from the ship, and also since they have assisted
the French troops, when we captured a vessel laden with military
stores from St. Andero.”
_Mr. Stuart to general Walker._
“_Lisbon, February 20, 1811._
“I own that from the various appointments which have lately taken
place in their armies, I forbode little advantage in the course of
the ensuing campaign; it is perhaps needful to tell you that my
fears are grounded on the nomination of the duke of Albuquerque
to Gallicia, Castaños to Estremadura, Mahi to Murcia, Coupigny to
Valencia, and the brother of O’Donnel to Catalonia.”
_Sir Howard Douglas to lord Wellington._
“_Villafranca, January 4, 1812._
“Each chief is allowed three servants, a captain two, a subaltern
one; the number of soldiers employed in this way is certainly not
_under_ the regulation, and all officers resident in the interior
likewise have this excessive indulgence. The officers’ servants never
do duty, or attend any drill or review. The cooks are in general
changed weekly, and are never present at drill or review; one cook is
allowed besides to every three serjeants. These two items certainly
take 5000 choice men from the ranks of this army.”
“Some very violent recriminations have been brought on by the
imprudent reply of the military press, to some observations published
in a Coruña paper extolling the Guerillas, and at the same time
intended to convey a censure on the conduct of the army. I have had
frequent conversations with general Abadia on the spirit of disunion
which these two papers are sowing. He has at length prohibited
the military press from publishing any thing but professional
papers. I was present when he gave the order—he engaged me in the
conversation, and I could not avoid observing, that what was lost
could only be regained by the sword, not the pen. In this I alluded
to the Asturias, where certainly reputation and public confidence
were sacrificed.”
“The truth is, the army is oppressive and expensive, as well as
inefficient, from its disorganised state, particularly in the
departments of supply; and it is a very unpleasant circumstance
to hear it generally admitted, that a Spanish corps is much more
destructive to the country than an equal French army. There are
also violent dissentions between the juntas of Leon and Gallicia:
inclosure No. 6 will shew this state of feeling.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account