History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
And lest this display of incompetency should not be sufficient, he
affirms, that the same sir John Moore had, comparatively, greater
means at Sahagun to beat the enemy than Lord Wellington had in the
lines of Torres Vedras. Now those lines, which Wellington had been
fortifying for more than a year, offered three nearly impregnable
positions, defended by a hundred thousand men. There was a fortress,
that of St. Julian’s, and a fleet, close at hand as a final resource,
and only sixty thousand French commanded by Massena were in front.
But sir John Moore having only twenty-three thousand men at Sahagun,
had no lines, no fortifications for defence, and no time to form
them, he was nearly three hundred miles from his fleet, and Napoleon
in person had turned one hundred thousand men against him, while two
hundred thousand more remained in reserve!
Any lengthened argument in opposition to a writer so totally
unqualified to treat of warlike affairs, would be a sinful waste of
words; but Mr. Robinson has been at pains to question the accuracy of
certain passages of my work, and with what justice the reader shall
now learn.[1]
1º. _Combat on the Coa._—The substance of Mr. Robinson’s complaint
on this subject is, that I have imputed to general Picton, the
odious crime of refusing, from personal animosity, to support
general Craufurd;—that such a serious accusation should not be made
without ample proof;—that I cannot say whether Picton’s instructions
did not forbid him to aid Craufurd;—that the roads were so bad,
the distance so great, and the time so short, Picton could not
have aided him;—that my account of the action differs from general
Craufurd’s;—that I was only a lieutenant of the forty-third, and
consequently could know nothing of the matter;—that I have not
praised Picton—that he was a Roman hero and so forth. Finally it is
denied that Picton ever quarrelled with Craufurd at all; and that, so
far from having an altercation with him on the day of the action he
did not on that day even quit his own quarters at Pinhel. Something
also there is about general Cole’s refusing to quit Guarda.
To all this I reply that I never did accuse general Picton of acting
from personal animosity, and neither the letter nor the spirit of my
statement will bear out such a meaning, which is a pure hallucination
of this author. That the light division was not supported is
notorious. The propriety of supporting it I have endeavoured to shew,
the cause why it was not so supported I have not attempted to divine;
yet it was neither the distance, nor the badness of the roads, nor
the want of time; for the action, which took place in July, lasted
from day-break until late in the evening, the roads, and there were
several, were good at that season, and the distance not more than
eight miles.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account