History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“Some months ago I took the liberty of pointing out to you certain
mis-statements contained in a publication of lord Beresford
regarding the operations of the British brigade in major-general
Leith’s corps at the battle of Busaco, and as those mis-statements
are again brought before the public in Robinson’s Life of sir Thomas
Picton I am induced to trouble you with some remarks upon what is
therein advanced. A paragraph in major-general Picton’s letter to
lord Wellington, dated 10th November, 1810, which I first discovered
some years ago in the Appendix No. 12 of Jones’s War in Spain, &c.
&c. would appear to be the document upon which Mr. Robinson grounds
his contradiction of your statement of the conduct of the ninth
regiment at Busaco, but _that_ paragraph, which runs as follows, I
am bound to say is _not_ the truth. ‘Major-general Leith’s brigade
in consequence marched on, and arrived in time to _join_ the
five companies of the forty-fifth regiment under the honourable
lieutenant-colonel Meade and the eighth Portuguese regiment under
lieutenant-colonel Douglas in repulsing the enemy.’ This assertion
of major-general Picton is, I repeat, _not true_, for, in the first
place I did not see the forty-fifth regiment on that day, nor was
I at any period during the action near them or any other British
regiment to my left. In the second, as regards the eighth Portuguese
regiment, the ninth British did not most assuredly join _that_ corps
in its retrograde movement. That major-general Picton left his right
flank exposed, there can be no question, and had not assistance, and
_British_ assistance too, come up to his aid as it did I am inclined
to believe that sir Thomas would have cut a very different figure
in the despatch to what he did!! Having already given you a detail
of the defeat of the enemy’s column which was permitted to gain the
ascendency in considerable force on the right of the third division,
I beg leave to refer you to the gallant officers I mentioned in a
former letter, who were not only eye-witnesses to the charge made by
the ninth regiment but actually distinguished themselves in front of
the regiment at the side of their brave accomplished general during
that charge. I believe the whole of sir Rowland Hill’s division
from a bend in the Sierra could see the ninth in their pursuit of
the enemy, and though last not the least in importance, as a party
concerned, I may mention the present major-general sir James T.
Barns, who commanded the British brigade under major-general Leith,
(I omitted this gallant officer’s name in my former letter) as the
major-general took the entire command and from him alone I received
all orders during the action.
“I have now done with Mr. Robinson and his work which was perhaps
hardly worth my notice.
“I am, my dear Colonel,
“Very sincerely yours,
“J. CAMERON.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account