History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The above reasoning leaves out the possibility of profiting from
a central position to fall with superior forces upon one of the
French columns. It supposes however that accurate information was
possessed by the French generals; that Maurice Mathieu was as strong
as he pretended to be, Suchet eager and resolute to form a junction
with him. But in truth Suchet knew not what to do after the fall
of Fort Balaguer, Maurice Mathieu had less than seven thousand men
of all arms, he was not followed by Decaen, and he imagined the
allies to have twenty thousand men, exclusive of the Catalans.
Besides which the position at Cape Salou was only six miles distant,
and Murray might with the aid of the draft bullocks discovered by
Donkin, have dragged all his heavy guns there, still maintaining the
investment; he might have shipped his battery train, and when the
enemy approached Reus, have marched to the Col de Balaguer, where he
could, as he afterwards did, embark or disembark in the presence of
the enemy. The danger of a flank march, Suchet being at Reus, could
not have deterred him, because he did send his cavalry and field
artillery by that very road on the 12th, when the French advanced
guard was at Monroig and actually skirmished with lord Frederick
Bentinck. Finally he could have embarked his main body, leaving a
small corps with some cavalry to keep the garrison in check and bring
off his guns. Such a detachment, together with the heavy guns, would
have been afloat in a couple of hours and on board the ships in four
hours; it could have embarked on the open beach, or, if fearful of
being molested by the garrison, might have marched to Cape Salou,
or to the Col de Balaguer; and if the guns had thus been lost, the
necessity would have been apparent, and the dishonour lessened. It
is clear therefore that there was no military need to sacrifice
the battery pieces. And those were the guns that shook the bloody
ramparts of Badajos!
Wellington felt their loss keenly, sir John Murray spoke of them
lightly. “_They were of small value, old iron! he attached little
importance to the sacrifice of artillery, it was his principle, he
had approved of colonel Adam losing his guns at Biar, and he had also
desired colonel Prevôt, if pressed, to abandon his battering train
before the Fort of Balaguer._” “_Such doctrine might appear strange
to a British army, but it was the rule with the continental armies
and the French owed much of their successes to the adoption of it._”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account