History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
In 1810 lord Wellington detached general Robert Craufurd with two or
three thousand men to a much greater distance, not for one night but
for many weeks. And that excellent officer, though close to Massena’s
immense army the very cavalry of which was double his whole numbers;
though he had the long line of the Agueda a fordable river to guard;
though he was in an open country and continually skirmishing, never
lost so much as a patrole and always remained master of his movements
for his combat on the Coa was a studied and wilful error. It was no
fault therefore to push colonel Adam’s detachment to Ordal, but it
was a fault that lord William, having determined to follow with his
whole force, should have delayed doing so for one night, or that
delaying he did not send some supporting troops forward. It was a
fault not to do so because there was good reason to do so, and to
delay was to tempt fortune. There was good reason to do so as well to
profit of the advantage of the position as to support Adam. Had lord
William Bentinck been at hand with his main body when the attack on
Ordal commenced, the head of Suchet’s force which was kept at bay for
three hours by a detachment so ill commanded would have been driven
into the ravine behind, and the victorious allies would still have
had time to march against Decaen by the road along which colonel
Cary endeavoured to join Manso. In fine, Suchet’s dispositions were
vicious in principle and ought not to have succeeded. He operated
on two distinct lines having no cross communications, and before an
enemy in possession of a central position with good communications.
3º. It was another fault that lord William Bentinck disregarded the
Spanish woman’s report to colonel Reeves; his observations made in
front of the bridge of Ordal on the evening of the 12th accorded
indeed with the reports of his own emissaries, but the safe side
should always be the rule of precaution. He also, although on the
spot, overlooked the unmilitary dispositions of colonel Adam on the
heights of Ordal. The summit could not be defended against superior
numbers with a small corps, and that officer had nevertheless
extended the Calabrese so far on the left that they could take
no share in the action, and yet could not retreat without great
difficulty. A commander who understood his business, would have
blocked up the bridge in front of the heights, and defended it by
a strong detachment, supporting that detachment by others placed in
succession on the heights behind, but keeping his main body always
in hand, ready either to fall on the head of the enemy’s column of
attack, or to rally the advanced detachments and retreat in order.
There were plenty of trees and stones to block the bridge, its own
parapet would have supplied materials, and the ravine was so deep and
rugged, that the enemy could not have crossed it on the flanks in the
dark.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account