History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
It is no defence to say colonel Adam only took his ground in the
evening after a march; that he expected the main body up the next
morning and that lord William assured him he was safe from attack.
Every officer is responsible for the security of his own troops,
and the precautions prescribed by the rules of war should never be
dispensed with or delayed at an outpost. Now it does not appear that
colonel Adam ever placed an infantry picquet on the bridge, or sent
a cavalry patrole beyond it; and I have been informed by a French
soldier, one of a party sent to explore the position, that they
reached the crest of the heights without opposition and returned
safely, whereupon Mesclop’s brigade instantly crossed the bridge and
attacked.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. 5.]
4º. Ordal might be called a surprize with respect to the
general-in-chief, yet the troops engaged were not surprised; they
were beaten and dispersed because colonel Adam was unskilful. The
French general’s victory was complete; but he has in his Memoirs
exaggerated his difficulties and the importance of his success,
his private report to the emperor was more accurate. The Memoirs
state that the English grenadiers defended certain works which
commanded the ascent of the main road, and in the accompanying atlas
a perspective view of well-conditioned redoubts with colours flying,
is given. The reader is thus led to imagine these were regular forts
of a fresh construction defended by select troops; but in the private
report they are correctly designated as ancient retrenchments, being
in fact the ruins of some old Spanish field-works and of no more
advantage to the allies than any natural inequality of ground. Again
in the Memoirs the attack of the French cavalry near Villa Franca is
represented as quite successful; but the private report only says the
rear was harassed by repeated charges, which is true, and moreover
those charges were vigorously repulsed. The whole French loss was
about three hundred men, that of the allies, heavy at Ordal, was
lightened by escape of prisoners during the night and ultimately did
not exceed a thousand men including Spaniards.
CHAPTER III.
[Sidenote: 1813. June.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account