History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The loss of the French was two hundred and forty men, that of the
allies considerable; the companies of the ninth under colonel
Cameron, alone, had seven officers and sixty men killed or wounded,
and the operation although successful was an error. The battery
erected on the right bank of the Urumea was not opened, wherefore,
either the assault was precipitated or the battery not necessary; but
the loss justified the conception of the battery.
When the action ceased the engineers made a lodgement in the redoubt,
and commenced two batteries for eight pieces to rake the horn-work
and the eastern rampart of the place. Two other batteries to contain
four sixty-eight-pound carronades and four ten-inch mortars were also
commenced on the right bank of the Urumea.
The 18th the besieged threw up traverses on the land front to meet
the raking fire of the besiegers, and the latter dragged four pieces
up the Monte Olia to plunge into the Mirador and other batteries on
the Monte Orgullo. In the night a lodgement was made on the ruins of
San Martin, the two batteries at the right attack were armed, and two
additional mortars dragged up the Monte Olia.
The 19th all the batteries at both attacks were armed, and in the
night two approaches being commenced from the suburb of San Martin
towards the cask redoubt the French were driven from that small work.
On the 20th the whole of the batteries opened their fire, the
greatest part being directed to form the breach.
[Sidenote: Notes of the Siege by sir C. Smith, MSS.]
Major Smith’s plan was similar to that followed by marshal Berwick a
century before. He proposed a lodgement on the horn-work before the
breach should be assailed, but he had not then read the description
of that siege and therefore unknowingly fixed the breaching-point
precisely where the wall had been most strongly rebuilt after
Berwick’s attack. This was the first fault, yet a slight one because
the wall did not resist the batteries very long, but it was a serious
matter that sir Thomas Graham at the suggestion of the commander
of the artillery began his operations by breaching. Major Smith
objected to it, and sir R. Fletcher acquiesced reluctantly on the
understanding that the ruining of the defences was only postponed, an
understanding afterwards unhappily forgotten.
The result of the first day’s attack was not satisfactory, the
weather proved bad, the guns mounted on ship carriages failed, one
twenty-four pounder was rendered unserviceable by the enemy, another
became useless from an accident, a captain of engineers was killed,
and the besiegers’ shot had little effect upon the solid wall. In the
night however the ship-guns were mounted on better carriages, and a
parallel across the isthmus was projected; but the greatest part of
the workmen, to avoid a tempest, sought shelter in the suburb of San
Martin and when day broke only one-third of the work was performed.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account