History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6 — John Shaqi
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“I think the account you give in your fourth volume of the attack
of the little breach at Ciudad Rodrigo is as favorable to Gurwood
as he has any right to expect, and agrees perfectly both with your
brother George’s recollections of that attack and with mine. Our late
friend Alexander Steele who was one of my officers declared he was
with Gurwood the whole of the time, for a great part of the storming
party of the forty-third joined Gurwood’s party who were placing the
ladders against the work, and it was the engineer officer calling out
that they were wrong and pointing out the way to the breach in the
fausse braye that directed our attention to it. Jonathan Wyld[3] of
the forty-third was the first man that run up the fausse braye, and
we made directly for the little breach which was defended _exactly
as you describe_. We were on the breach some little time and when we
collected about thirty men (some of the third battalion rifle brigade
in the number) we made a simultaneous rush, cheered, and run in, so
that positively no claim could be made as to the first who entered
the breach. I do not want to dispute with Gurwood but I again say
(in which your brother agrees) that some of the storming party were
_before_ the forlorn hope. I do not dispute that Gurwood and some
of his party were among the number that rushed in at the breach,
but as to his having twice mounted the breach before us, _I cannot
understand it_, and Steele always _positively denied it_.”
Having thus justified myself from the charge of writing upon bad
information about the assault of the little breach I shall add
something about that of the great breach.
Colonel Gurwood offers himself as an encouraging example for the
subalterns of the British army in future wars; but the following
extract from a statement of the late major Mackie, so well known for
his bravery worth and modesty, and who as a subaltern led the forlorn
hope at the great breach of Ciudad Rodrigo, denies colonel Gurwood’s
claim to the particular merit upon which he seems inclined to found
his good fortune in after life.
Extracts from a memoir addressed by the late Major MACKIE to
Colonel NAPIER. October 1838.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account