History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Having as such succeeded so immediately after to a
company, I could scarcely expect nor did I ask further promotion at
the time, but after many years of additional service, I did still
conceive and do still maintain, that I was entitled to bring forward
my services on that day as a ground for asking that step of rank
which every officer leading a forlorn hope had received with the
exception of myself.
“May I, sir, appeal to your sense of justice in lending me your
aid to prevent my being deprived of the only reward I had hitherto
enjoyed, in the satisfaction of thinking that the services which
I am now compelled most reluctantly to bring in some way to the
notice of the public, had during the period that has since elapsed,
never once been called in question. It was certainly hard enough
that a service of this nature should have been productive of no
advantage to me in my military life. I feel it however infinitely
more annoying that I should now find myself in danger of being stript
of any credit to which it might entitle me, by the looseness of the
manner in which colonel Gurwood words his statement. I need not
say that this danger is only the more imminent from his statement
appearing in a work which as being published under the auspices of
the duke of Wellington as well as of the Horse Guards, has at least
the appearance of coming in the guise of an official authority,”
“I agree most cordially with colonel Gurwood in the opinion he has
expressed in his note, that he is himself an instance where reward
and merit have gone hand in hand. I feel compelled however, for the
reasons given to differ from him materially as to the precise ground
on which he considers the honours and advantages that have followed
his deserts to be not only the distinguished but the just and natural
consequences of his achievements on that day. _I allude to the claim
advanced by colonel Gurwood to be considered the individual by whom
the governor of Ciudad Rodrigo was made prisoner of war._ It could
scarcely be expected that at such a moment I could be aware that the
sword which I received was not the governor’s being in fact that of
one of his aide-de-camps. I repeat however that before lieutenant
Gurwood and his party came up, the enemy had expressed their wish to
surrender, that a sword was presented by them in token of submission
and received by me as a pledge, on the honour of a British officer,
that according to the laws of war, I held myself responsible for
their safety as prisoners under the protection of the British arms.
Not a shadow of resistance was afterwards made and I appeal to every
impartial mind in the least degree acquainted with the rules of
modern warfare, if under these circumstances I am not justified in
asserting that before, and at the time lieutenant Gurwood arrived,
the whole of the enemy’s garrison within the walls of the citadel,
governor included, were both _de jure_ and _de facto_ prisoners to
myself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account