History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Soult now caused count D’Erlon to re-occupy the hills about Ainhoa,
Clauzel to take post on the heights in advance of Sarre, and Reille
to carry his two divisions to St. Jean de Luz in second line behind
Villatte’s reserve. Foy, who had rashly uncovered St. Jean Pied de
Port by descending upon Cambo, was ordered to return and reinforce
his troops with all that he could collect of national guards and
detachments.
Wellington had on the 1st directed general Graham to collect his
forces and bring up pontoons for crossing the Bidassoa, but he
finally abandoned this design, and the two armies therefore rested
quiet in their respective positions, after nine days of continual
movement during which they had fought ten serious actions. Of the
allies, including the Spaniards, seven thousand three hundred
officers and soldiers had been killed wounded or taken, and many were
dispersed from fatigue or to plunder. On the French side the loss was
terrible and the disorder rendered the official returns inaccurate.
Nevertheless a close approximation may be made. Lord Wellington at
first called it twelve thousand, but hearing that the French officers
admitted more he raised his estimate to fifteen thousand. The
engineer, _Belmas_, in his Journals of Sieges, compiled from official
documents by order of the French government, sets down above thirteen
thousand. Soult in his dispatches at the time, stated fifteen hundred
as the loss at Maya, four hundred at Roncesvalles, two hundred on
the 27th, and eighteen hundred on the 28th, after which he speaks
no more of losses by battle. There remains therefore to be added
the killed and wounded at the combats of Linzoain on the 26th, the
double battles of Sauroren and Buenza on the 30th, the combats of the
31st, and those of the 1st and 2d of August; finally, four thousand
unwounded prisoners. Let this suffice. It is not needful to sound
the stream of blood in all its horrid depths.
OBSERVATIONS.
1º. The allies’ line of defence was weak. Was it therefore
injudiciously adopted?
The French beaten at Vittoria were disorganized and retreated without
artillery or baggage on excentric lines; Foy by Guipuscoa, Clauzel
by Zaragoza, Reille by San Estevan, the King by Pampeluna. There was
no reserve to rally upon, the people fled from the frontier, Bayonne
and St. Jean Pied de Port if not defenceless were certainly in a very
neglected state, and the English general might have undertaken any
operation, assumed any position, offensive or defensive, which seemed
good to him. Why then did he not establish the Anglo-Portuguese
beyond the mountains, leaving the Spaniards to blockade the
fortresses behind him? The answer to this question involves the
difference between the practice and the theory of war.
[Sidenote: Wellington’s Dispatches.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account