History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“_The soldiers, instead of preparing food and resting themselves
after the battle dispersed in the night to plunder, and were so
fatigued that when the rain came on the next day they were incapable
of marching and had more stragglers than the beaten enemy. Eighteen
days after the victory twelve thousand five hundred men, chiefly
British, were absent, most of them marauding in the mountains._”
Such were the reasons assigned by the English general for his slack
pursuit after the battle of Vittoria, yet he had commanded that army
for six years! Was he then deficient in the first qualification
of a general, the art of disciplining and inspiring troops, or was
the English military system defective? It is certain that he always
exacted the confidence of his soldiers as a leader. It is not so
certain that he ever gained their affections. The barbarity of the
English military code excited public horror, the inequality of
promotion created public discontent; yet the general complained he
had no adequate power to reward or punish, and he condemned alike the
system and the soldiers it produced. The latter “_were detestable
for every thing but fighting, and the officers as culpable as the
men_.” The vehemence of these censures is inconsistent with his
celebrated observation, subsequently made, namely, “that he thought
he could go any where and do any thing with the army that fought on
the Pyrenees,” and although it cannot be denied that his complaints
were generally too well-founded, there were thousands of true and
noble soldiers, and zealous worthy officers, who served their country
honestly and merited no reproaches. It is enough that they have been
since neglected, exactly in proportion to their want of that corrupt
aristocratic influence which produced the evils complained of.
2º. When the misconduct of the troops had thus weakened the effect
of victory, the question of following Joseph at once into France
assumed a new aspect. Wellington’s system of warfare had never varied
after the battle of Talavera. Rejecting dangerous enterprize, it
rested on profound calculation both as to time and resources for the
accomplishment of a particular object, namely, the gradual liberation
of Spain by the Anglo-Portuguese army. Not that he held it impossible
to attain that object suddenly, and his battles in India, the
passage of the Douro, the advance to Talavera, prove that by nature
he was inclined to daring operations; but such efforts, however
glorious, could not be adopted by a commander who feared even the
loss of a brigade lest the government he served should put an end to
the war. Neither was it suitable to the state of his relations with
the Portuguese and Spaniards; their ignorance jealousy and passionate
pride, fierce in proportion to their weakness and improvidence, would
have enhanced every danger.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account