History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
No man could have anticipated the extraordinary errors of the
French in 1813. Wellington did not expect to cross the Ebro before
the end of the campaign, and his battering train was prepared for
the siege of Burgos not for that of Bayonne. A sudden invasion of
France her military reputation considered, was therefore quite out
of the pale of his methodized system of warfare, which was founded
upon political as well as military considerations; and of the most
complicated nature, seeing that he had at all times to deal with the
personal and factious interests and passions, as well as the great
state interests of three distinct nations two of which abhorred each
other. At this moment also, the uncertain state of affairs in Germany
strongly influenced his views. An armistice which might end in a
separate peace excluding England, would have brought Napoleon’s whole
force to the Pyrenees, and Wellington held cheap both the military
and political proceedings of the coalesced powers. “_I would not
move a corporal’s guard in reliance upon such a system_,” was the
significant phrase he employed to express his contempt.
These considerations justified his caution as to invading France,
but there were local military reasons equally cogent. 1º. He could
not dispense with a secure harbour, because the fortresses still
in possession of the French, namely, Santona, Pancorbo, Pampeluna,
and St. Sebastian, interrupted his communications with the interior
of Spain; hence the siege of the latter place. 2º. He had to guard
against the union of Suchet and Clauzel on his right flank; hence his
efforts to cut off the last-named general; hence also the blockade of
Pampeluna in preference to siege and the launching of Mina and the
bands on the side of Zaragoza.
3º. After Vittoria the nature of the campaign depended upon
Suchet’s operations, which were rendered more important by Murray’s
misconduct. The allied force on the eastern coast was badly
organized, it did not advance from Valencia as we have seen until
the 16th, and then only partially and by the coast, whereas Suchet
had assembled more than twenty thousand excellent troops on the
Ebro as early as the 12th of July; and had he continued his march
upon Zaragoza he would have saved the castle of that place with
its stores. Then rallying Paris’ division, he could have menaced
Wellington’s flank with twenty-five thousand men exclusive of
Clauzel’s force, and if that general joined him with forty thousand.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account