History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
His motives for this were strong. He knew the armistice in Germany
had been renewed with a view to peace, and he had therefore reason to
expect Soult would be reinforced. A forward position in France would
have lent his right to the enemy who pivotted upon St. Jean Pied de
Port could operate against his flank. His arrangements for supply,
and intercourse with his depôts and hospitals, would have been more
difficult and complicated, and as the enemy possessed all the French
and Spanish fortresses commanding the great roads, his need to gain
one, at least, before the season closed, was absolute if he would
not resign his communications with the interior of Spain. Then long
marches and frequent combats had fatigued his troops destroyed their
shoes and used up their musquet ammunition; and the loss of men had
been great, especially of British in the second division where their
proportion to foreign troops was become too small. The difficulty
of re-equipping the troops would have been increased by entering an
enemy’s state, because the English system did not make war support
war and his communications would have been lengthened. Finally it
was France that was to be invaded, France in which every person was
a soldier, where the whole population was armed and organised under
men, not as in other countries inexperienced in war but who had all
served more or less. Beyond the Adour the army could not advance,
and if a separate peace was made by the northern powers, if any
misfortune befel the allies in Catalonia so as to leave Suchet at
liberty to operate towards Pampeluna, or if Soult profiting from
the possession of San Jean Pied de Port should turn the right flank
of the new position, a retreat into Spain would become necessary,
and however short would be dangerous from the hostility and warlike
disposition of the people directed in a military manner.
These reasons joined to the fact, that a forward position, although
offering better communications from right to left, would have given
the enemy greater facilities for operating against an army which must
until the fortresses fell hold a defensive and somewhat extended
line, were conclusive as to the rashness of an invasion; but they do
not appear so conclusive as to the necessity of stopping short after
the action of the 2d of August. The questions were distinct. The one
was a great measure involving vast political and military conditions,
the other was simply whether Wellington should profit of his own
victory and the enemy’s distresses; and in this view the objections
above-mentioned, save the want of shoes the scarcity of ammunition
and the fatigue of the troops, are inapplicable. But in the two last
particulars the allies were not so badly off as the enemy, and in
the first not so deficient as to cripple the army, wherefore if the
advantage to be gained was worth the effort it was an error to halt.
[Sidenote: Soult’s Official Report, MSS.]
[Sidenote: Soult’s Official Report, MSS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account