History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
My lord, I shall now proceed with my task in the manner I have
before alluded to. You have indeed left me no room for that refined
courtesy with which I could have wished to soften the asperities of
this controversy, but I must request of you to be assured, and I say
it in all sincerity, that I attribute the errors to which I must
revert, not to any wilful perversion or wilful suppression of facts,
but entirely to a natural weakness of memory, and the irritation of
a mind confused by the working of wounded vanity. I acknowledge that
it is a hard trial to have long-settled habits of self satisfaction
suddenly disturbed,—
“Cursed be my harp and broke be every chord,
If I forget thy worth, _victorious Beresford_.”
It was thus the flattering muse of poetry lulled you with her sweet
strains into a happy dream of glory, and none can wonder at your
irritation when the muse of history awakened you with the solemn
clangour of her trumpet to the painful reality that you were only an
ordinary person. My lord, it would have been wiser to have preserved
your equanimity, there would have been some greatness in that.
In your first Strictures you began by asserting that I knew nothing
whatever of you or your services; and that I was actuated entirely by
vulgar political rancour when I denied your talents as a general. To
this I replied that I was not ignorant of your exploits. That I knew
something of your proceedings at Buenos Ayres, at Madeira, and at
Coruña; and in proof thereof I offered to enter into the details of
the first, if you desired it. To this I have received no answer.
You affirmed that your perfect knowledge of the Portuguese language
was one of your principal claims to be commander of the Portuguese
army. In reply I quoted from your own letter to lord Wellington,
your confession, that, such was your ignorance of that language at
the time you could not even read the communication from the regency,
relative to your own appointment.
You asserted that no officer, save sir John Murray, objected at the
first moment to your sudden elevation of rank. In answer I published
sir John Sherbroke’s letter to sir J. Cradock complaining of it.
You said the stores (which the Cabildo of Ciudad Rodrigo refused to
let you have in 1809) had not been formed by lord Wellington. In
reply I published lord Wellington’s declaration that they had been
formed by him.
You denied that you had ever written a letter to the junta of
Badajos, and this not doubtfully or hastily, but positively and
accompanied with much scorn and ridicule of my assertion to that
effect. You harped upon the new and surprising information I had
obtained relative to your actions, and were, in truth, very facetious
upon the subject. In answer I published your own letter to that
junta! So much for your first Strictures.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account