History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
seems some foundation for Clauzel’s complaint, namely, that he had
for five hours fought on his main position, and during that time no
help had come, although the camp of Serres was close at hand, the
distance from St. Jean de Luz to that place only four miles, and the
attack in the low ground evidently a feint. This then was Soult’s
error. He suffered sir John Hope to hold in play twenty-five thousand
men in the low ground, while fifteen thousand under Clauzel lost the
battle on the hills.
2º. The French army was inferior in numbers and many of the works
were unfinished; and yet two strong divisions, Daricau’s and Foy’s,
were quite thrown out of the fight, for the slight offensive
movement made by the latter produced no effect whatever. Vigorous
counter-attacks are no doubt essential to a good defence, and it was
in allusion to this that Napoleon, speaking of Joseph’s position
behind the Ebro in the beginning of the war, said, “if a river were
as broad and rapid as the Danube it would be nothing without secure
points for passing to the offensive.” The same maxim applies to
lines, and Soult grandly conceived and applied this principle when
he proposed the descent upon Aragon to Suchet. But he conceived it
meanly and poorly when he ordered Foy to attack by the Gorospil
mountain. That general’s numbers were too few, and the direction of
the march false; one regiment in the field of battle at the decisive
moment would have been worth three on a distant and secondary point.
Foy’s retreat was inevitable if D’Erlon failed, and wanting the
other’s aid he did fail. What success could Foy obtain? He might
have driven Mina’s battalions over the Puerto de Maya and quite
through the Bastan; he might have defeated Morillo and perhaps have
taken general Hill’s baggage; yet all this would have weighed little
against the allies’ success at Amotz; and the deeper he penetrated
the more difficult would have been his retreat. The incursion into
the Bastan by Yspegui proposed by him on the 6th, although properly
rejected by Soult would probably have produced greater effects than
the one executed by Gorospil on the 10th. A surprise on the 6th,
Hill’s troops being then in march by brigades through the Alduides,
might have brought some advantages to the French, and perhaps delayed
the general attack beyond the 10th, when the heavy rains which set in
on the 11th would have rendered it difficult to attack at all: Soult
would thus have had time to complete his works.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account