History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
3º. It has been observed that a minor cause of defeat was the
drawing up of the French troops in front instead of in rear of the
redoubts. This may possibly have happened in some places from error
and confusion, not by design, for Clauzel’s report expressly states
that Maransin was directed to form in rear of the redoubts and charge
the allies when they were between the works and the abbatis. It is
however needless to pry closely into these matters when the true
cause lies broad on the surface. Lord Wellington directed superior
numbers with superior skill. The following analysis will prove this,
but it must be remembered that the conscripts are not included in the
enumeration of the French force: being quite undisciplined they were
kept in masses behind and never engaged.
Abbé’s division, furnishing five thousand old soldiers, was posted
in two lines one behind the other, and they were both paralyzed by
the position of Morillo’s division and Mina’s battalions. Foy’s
division was entirely occupied by the same troops. Six thousand of
Wellington’s worst soldiers therefore sufficed to employ twelve
thousand of Soult’s best troops during the whole day. Meanwhile
Hill fell upon the decisive point where there was only D’Armagnac’s
division to oppose him, that is to say, five thousand against twenty
thousand. And while the battle was secured on the right of the
Nivelle by this disproportion, Beresford on the other bank thrust
twenty-four thousand against the ten thousand composing Conroux’s
and Maransin’s divisions. Moreover as Hill and Beresford, advancing,
the one from his left the other from his right, formed a wedge
towards the bridge of Amotz, forty-four thousand men composing the
six divisions under those generals, fell upon the fifteen thousand
composing the divisions of D’Armagnac Conroux and Maransin; and
these last were also attacked in detail, because part of Conroux’s
troops were defeated near Sarre, and Barbot’s brigade of Maransin’s
corps was beaten on the Rhune by the light division before the main
position was attacked. Finally Alten with eight thousand men, having
first defeated Barbot’s brigade, fell upon Taupin who had only
three thousand while the rest of the French army was held in check
by Freyre and Hope. Thus more than fifty thousand troops full of
confidence from repeated victories were suddenly thrown upon the
decisive point where there were only eighteen thousand dispirited by
previous reverses to oppose them. Against such a thunderbolt there
was no defence in the French works. Was it then a simple matter for
Wellington so to combine his battle? The mountains on whose huge
flanks he gathered his fierce soldiers, the roads he opened, the
horrid crags he surmounted, the headlong steeps he descended, the
wild regions through which he poured the destructive fire of more
than ninety guns, these and the reputation of the French commander
furnish the everlasting reply.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account