History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Your lordship closes this subject by the following observation. “As
colonel Napier represents himself as having been an eye-witness of
a gallant movement made by a certain Portuguese regiment,—which
regiment he does not profess to know,—but which movement took place
a mile distant from the position given to the nineteenth regiment,
it is evident he could not also have been an eye-witness of what was
passing a mile to the left. Nor can he therefore negative what is
said to have occurred there. It is extraordinary that the historian
should not have perceived the predicament in which he has placed
himself.” Now your lordship does not say that the two events occurred
at the _same time_, wherefore your conclusion is what the renowned
Partridge calls a “_non sequitur_;” and as general M‘Bean expressly
affirms his charge to have taken place on the _right_ of the light
division, it was not absolutely necessary that I should look to the
_left_ in order to see the said charge. Hence the predicament in
which I am placed, is that of being obliged to remark your lordship’s
inability to reason upon your own materials.
Your next subject is captain Squire, but I will pass over that
matter as having been I think sufficiently discussed before, and
I am well assured that the memory of that very gallant and able
officer will never suffer from your lordship’s angry epithets.
Campo Mayor follows. In your “_Further Strictures_” you said that
colonel Colborne was not near the scene of action; you now show in
detail that he was actively engaged in it. You denied also that he
was in support of the advanced guard, and yet quote his own report
explaining how he happened to be separated from the advanced guard
just before the action, thus proving that he was marching in support
of it. You refuse any credit to the statements of captain Gregory and
colonel Light; and you endeavour to discredit and trample upon the
evidence of the officer of the thirteenth dragoons who was an actor
in the charge of that regiment, but with respect to him a few remarks
are necessary.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account