History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
My lord, you will never by such special pleading, I know of no other
term by which I can properly designate your argument, you will never,
I say, by such special pleading, hide your bad generalship at Campo
Mayor. The proofs of your errors there are too many and too clear;
the errors themselves too glaring too gross to leave you the least
hope; the same confusion of head which prevented you from seizing the
advantages then offered to you seems to prevail in your writing; and
yet while impeaching every person’s credit where their statements
militate against your object, you demand the most implicit confidence
in your own contradictory assertions and preposterous arguments. My
lord, you only fatigue yourself and your readers by your unwieldy
floundering, you are heavy and throw much mud about; like one of
those fine Andalusian horses so much admired in the Peninsula, you
prance and curvet and foam and labour in your paces but you never get
on. At Campo Mayor you had an enormous superiority of troops, the
enemy were taken by surprize, they were in a plain, their cavalry
were beaten, their artillery-drivers cut down, their infantry, hemmed
in by your horsemen and under the play of your guns, were ready to
surrender; yet you suffered them to escape and to carry off their
captured artillery and then you blamed your gallant troops. The enemy
escaped from you, my lord, but you cannot escape from the opinion
of the world by denying the truth of all statements which militate
against you.
_The march by Merida._ If you had said at once that the duke of
Wellington forbade you to go by Merida, there would have been an
end of all my arguments against your skill; yet it by no means
follows that these arguments would be futile in themselves, though
not applicable to you personally. New combinations were presented,
and the duke of Wellington might very probably have changed his
instructions had he been present on the spot. But, why was this your
justification withheld until now? why was so plain, so clear, so
decisive a defence of yourself never thought of before? and why is
it now smothered with such a heap of arguments as you have added,
to prove that you ought not to have gone by Merida? Have you found
out that I am not such a bad reasoner upon military affairs as you
were pleased to style me in your former publication? Have you found
out that pleading high rank is not a sufficient answer to plain and
well supported statements? It is good however that you have at last
condescended to adopt a different mode of proceeding. I applaud you
for it, and with the exception of two points I will leave you in the
full enjoyment of any triumph which the force of your arguments may
procure you; always, however, retaining my right to assume that your
lordship’s memory with respect to the duke of Wellington’s negative,
may have been as treacherous as it was about your own letter to the
junta of Badajos.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account