History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
name upon your own anonymous statements, thus making five testimonies
out of two.
The answer is simple and plain. When I took sir Benjamin D’Urban as
a guide he led me wrong; and you instead of visiting his error upon
his own head visit it upon mine, and require me and your readers
to follow him implicitly upon all points while to do so avails for
your defence, but not when they contradict it. From sir B. D’Urban
I took the _calibre_ of the allies’ guns employed in the battle of
Albuera, and he was wrong! From him, if I had not possessed sir A.
Dickson’s official return, I should also have taken the _number_ of
guns, and I should have been wrong, because he calls them thirty-four
instead of thirty-eight. He also (see page 26 of the Appendix to your
Further Strictures) says that the Spaniards had six guns, whereas
Dickson says, they had but four; and if his six guns were reckoned
there would have been forty pieces of artillery, which he however
reduced to thirty-four by another error, namely, leaving out a whole
brigade of German artillery. On sir Benjamin’s authority I called
major Dickson the commander of the artillery, and this also was
wrong. From sir Benjamin D’Urban’s Memoir, I took the statement that
the fourth division arrived on the field of battle at _six o’clock
in the morning_, and yet I am assured that they did not arrive until
nine o’clock, and after the action had commenced. And this last is a
very serious error because it gives the appearance of skill to your
lordship’s combinations for battle and to sir Benjamin’s arrangements
for the execution, which they do not merit, if, as I now believe,
that division arrived at nine o’clock. But the latter hour would be
quite in keeping with the story of the cavalry going to forage, and
both together would confirm another report very current, namely,
that your lordship did not anticipate any battle on the 16th of May.
Setting this however aside, I know not why, in the face of all these
glaring errors and a multitude of smaller ones, I am to take sir
Benjamin D’Urban’s authority upon any disputed point.
I will now, my lord, admit one complete triumph which you have
attained in your dissertation upon the numbers of the troops. I did
say that from the 20th of March to the 16th of May, was only twenty
days, and though the oversight is so palpably one that could not be
meant to deceive, I will not deny your right to ridicule and to laugh
at it. I have laughed at so many of your lordship’s oversights that
it would be unfair to deny you this opportunity for retaliation,
which I also admit you have used moderately.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account