History of the Washington National Monument and of the Washington National Monument SocietyHarvey, Frederick L. (Frederick Loviad)
History
History of the Washington National Monument and of the Washington National Monument Society
Harvey, Frederick L. (Frederick Loviad)
Washington Monument (Washington, D.C.); Washington National Monument Society
This advertisement availed nothing as to the discovery of the guilty
persons. It was understood to have been the work of persons belonging to
the party styled "Know-Nothings;" one of their professions being
opposition to the Roman Catholic Church and any political preference of
its members. It was not thought the persons were generally depraved
characters, but, on the contrary, were supposed to be identified with
the respectable part of the community. From the time of the reception of
this stone from Rome by the Society until its destruction, there had
been frequent expressions in a portion of the daily press in opposition
to its being placed in the Monument, and the Society had received many
protesting letters and, in some instances, long petitions from various
parts of the country, numerously signed, urging that the stone be not
used by the Society, as it was representative of the Roman Church, &c.
Many petitions from New Jersey recited:
"We, the undersigned, citizens of ----, in the State of New Jersey,
believing the proffer of a block of marble recently made by the Pope
of Rome to this country for the Washington Monument to be totally
inconsistent with the known principles of that despotic system of
government of which he is the head; that the inscription, 'Rome to
America,' engraved upon it, bears a significance beyond its natural
meaning; that the construction is an artful stratagem, calculated to
divert the attention of the American people for the present from his
animosity to republican institutions by an outward profession of
regard; that the gift of a despot, if placed within those walls, can
never be looked upon by true Americans but with feelings of
mortification and disgust; and believing that the original design of
the structure was to perpetuate the memory of Washington as the
champion of American liberty, its national character should be
preserved, do therefore most earnestly protest against the placing
of said stone within the Monument, or any other stone from any other
than a republican government."
But the Society was not organized on sectarian or political lines, and
to the opposition and protests no heed was given. The Society was
composed of men of different political beliefs and church affiliations.
The immediate effect of the destruction of the "Pope's stone" was to
anger a large body of the citizens of the country, members of the
Catholic Church, and then, and for a long time afterward, to estrange
any interest they had had in the building of the Monument, and to this
extent to impair the field for the collection of funds for the Monument.
It has never been certainly known what the precise fate of the stone
was, though occasional uncorroborated statements of individuals,
alleging knowledge of or participation in its destruction, have been
made as to it. But their variance has rendered them of no value.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account