History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
History
History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.
Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
Water-supply -- History; Water-supply -- Ohio -- Hamilton County
At pumping works, 1.81 11.39 4.18
At mouth Eggleston Avenue sewer, 4.41 17.91 11.16
At Storrs and Lower River, 1.96 10.00 5.94
Although increased by the whole sewage of the city in addition to
Licking River, Covington, and steamboat contamination, the proportion
of sewage at Storrs in its worst condition is chemically shown to be
little better than at the pumping works.
THAMES RIVER.
Although the water of the Thames has been submitted to analyses by
different chemists, on many hundred occasions, no constituent which
could be pronounced noxious, has been detected; but the history of
the water traced in the inorganic constituents above referred to,
always reveals that which is, indeed, well known to be the fact--its
previous contamination with sewage or animal matters--(Rivers
Pollution Commission, 1874.)
The area of water-shed drainage of the Thames above pumping station
is 3,675 square miles, the minimum summer flow of 350 millions of
gallons daily. There are one million persons above the intakes of
pumping works. The whole river and its principal tributaries are
under strictest sanitary regulation, which the government is able to
enforce, notwithstanding a great mass of sewage is poured into the
stream.
The Rivers Pollution Commission, of 1874, sum up their investigation
of the Thames and Lea Rivers as follows:
“1st. That the river receives the sewage from a large number
of towns and other inhabited places, the washings of a large
cultivated land, and the filthy discharge from many industrial
processes and manufactures.
“2d. That the water is used for bathing, washing of sheep and
cattle, and dirty linen and putrid carcasses of animals float upon
its surface.
“3d. That it is the common water way for a large amount of
dangerous polluting matter, etc.
“4th. That in time of flood a large proportion, both of the
suspended and dissolved filth, is conveyed down to the intakes, and
in ordinary weather considerable portion of soluble organic matter
makes its way to the pumping works, and is still present in the
water distributed _to the consumers_.
“5th. That the water is, nevertheless, when efficiently filtered,
free from any offensive taste or odor.
“6th. That, notwithstanding the application of partial remedies,
for sewage pollution, at Banbury, Eton, and Windsor, and the
great care exercised by most of the companies in the storage and
filtration of the water, the organic pollution contained in the
Thames water delivered in London, though subject to fluctuations
from the greater or less prevalence of floods, does not diminish.
The proportion of organic impurity present in Thames water, as
delivered in London, was:
“In 1868, 1,000
In 1869, 1,016
In 1870, 795
In 1871, 928
In 1872, 1,243
In 1873, 917
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account